http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/big-read-auston-matthews-unlike-maple-leafs-star-decades/
good read. Thank you Gare Joyce.
good read. Thank you Gare Joyce.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/auston-matthews-delivers-big-way-leafs-yet/“For a guy that size he can move,” Toews said of Matthews. “He’s just got his head up and there’s not too many guys with that skill level that he has. Late in the game, we gave him one too many chances and he’s the type of player that’s going to make you pay. He’s good at kind of finding the soft areas.
“I think he does a lot of things similar to Kaner, the way he’s smart playing without the puck. Unfortunately, we couldn’t quite keep him off the scoresheet tonight. He got a big one for his team.”
Yeah. Pretty good indeed. I always liked how Tim Duncan and Lidstroms of the world handled themselves.Someone on HF compared Matthews demeanor to Tim Duncan. I thought that was pretty good.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Yeah. Pretty good indeed. I always liked how Tim Duncan and Lidstroms of the world handled themselves.
Yeah, Crosby is still the King, until he's dethroned.
In McDavid's case, one 100-point regular season, followed by a mediocre playoff run that culminated in a second round exit...that's not going to get the job done.
In Matthews' case, a 40-goal, 69-point rookie season, solid performance in a first round exit and strong start to the following season also isn't enough to seriously move him into contention.
At the moment, in fact, I think I'd still have Hot Karl ahead of both of them in the "best player in the league" discussion. But as leafman said, a lot of this debate is going to come down to winning. Both Karlsson & Crosby put their teams on their backs and carried them far, so let's see what those two do this year, and how far McDavid & Matthews can carry their teams.
I mean I know mcdavid is good but I just don't know anymore - would I really want him here instead of the Matthews we've seen this year?