MindzEye
Wayward Ditch Pig
When they don't actually separate fact from bullshit, then yes, it is shilling for the establishment.
Examples of them actually doing what you're accusing them of?
When they don't actually separate fact from bullshit, then yes, it is shilling for the establishment.
Examples of them actually doing what you're accusing them of?
Six of those "sources" are links to other "Truth Wiki" articles.There are 15 sources listed.
There are 15 sources listed.
There are 15 sources listed.
Like Forbes.
Nope. Forbes is not once of the sources listed. There is however, a link to a "Truth Wiki" article on Forbes.
One actual primary source among those listed is Vanity Fair.
But it links to a 15 year-old article on George W Bush's ties to the Saudis that doesn't appear to make any mention at all of Snopes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevl...fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#15a5bffa227f
You asked for examples, I provided examples.
Then there is the whole fact that they sent up a hail mary crowdfunding rescue cry... yeah all is well at snopes.
This guy seems to miss the ****ing plot entirely.
So does Johnny, most of the time.
Or maybe Snopes are bought and paid for shills?
They all are.
You can only really trust Breitbart, InfoWars and the National Enquirer to get the real truth.