Well considering the fact that they were pretty much set to hire Boucher and then abruptly scratched those plans in order to hire Babcock I'd say that their plans are pretty fluid. And I think that whatever plans they may have had for a full-blown tear-down and rebuild probably also went out the window once Babcock was hired. You don't pay a guy who has never overseen a rebuild $50 mil to oversee a rebuild. Clearly they are expecting playoff revenue, not lottery picks.
But then that's the problem with MLSE: top heavy management structure with people working at cross-purposes all the time. One guy wanted a rebuild; someone else wanted to hire a coach with name recognition who could get them into the playoffs. Another guy decided to buy a football team. Still another decided to leak the Babcock rumour during the time when they knew (or ought to have known) that the football press conference would be taking place (and don't think that was an accident because it wasn't)
Bottom line: MLSE doesn't really have a plan; at least not one that they're willing to follow from beginning to end. There's a plan this morning and by the time you're finished eating lunch there's a completely different plan in place. They are the poster children of dysfunctional management. The knobs in Toronto know full well that perception is reality. It doesn't matter if the Habs have more fans worldwide or that the Leafs have practically no fans whatsoever in Quebec. The Leafs are Canada's Team because the Toronto-based national media says they are and treats them like they are. The media doesn't respond to opinions on this point; they dictate opinion on this point. They have decided that the Leafs are the team that matters and that's that.
...
This is what four decades of Quebec nationalism gets us. Everything important that used to be in Montreal has now moved to Toronto. The English media profile is no greater in Montreal than it is in Edmonton or Winnipeg or Regina. There's just Toronto and then everyplace else is lumped together as "the rest". Montreal isn't special anymore. It doesn't compete with Toronto in anything that matters anymore outside of sports. Technically the head office of the Royal Bank is still in Montreal but all the big decisions and the big wigs who make those decisions reside in Toronto. I've lived in both cities but when I go to Montreal I see empty tracts of land that were empty back when I was a kid. I go to Toronto and so much has changed since the last time I was there that I don't even recognize what city I'm in.
We need to stop trying to pretend that Montreal as a city is relevant anymore because it's not. The ONLY thing we have left is that friggin' hockey team that doesn't seem to want to win Cups all that badly anymore.
...
I couldn't care less. Either path means that the Leafs are irrelevant for the next few seasons and few teams ever stick to a plan for more than a couple of seasons before internal and/or external pressures forces them to change. MLSE has never shown the patience required for a proper rebuild in the past. I don't see that changing given the confrontational make-up of their management team.
...
I chose the avatar as a provocation back in the days when I used to post on the Leafs board. I never bothered changing it (in part because it's been so long that I forget how to do that, lol) Of course, unless or until the Leafs win a Cup there's no need to change it, is there? It's as relevant in 2015 as it was in 1968 and its impact increases with each passing season.
When I said that I couldn't care less about the Leafs I was talking about right now. Back when they were relevant and in danger of winning I worried about it and would watch their playoff games rooting for them to be eliminated. My hatred of the Ottawa Senators is more about how they continually failed to eliminate the Leafs than about anything they've done to the Habs. But since the 2005 lockout I've barely given the Leafs a second thought. I knew that once a salary cap was brought in the Leafs would have to get by on their wits instead of just throwing money around. And since I've always maintained that the Leafs are run by half-wits I knew they couldn't go very far. And history has proven that I was right. One measly playoff appearance since the introduction of the cap (and that was in a lock-out shortened season. to boot)
So right now, at least, I don't really think too much about the Leafs and the signing of Babcock isn't moving me in the direction of caring. Today he's the messiah, just like Brian Burke and Pat Quinn were before him. The media can fawn over him as much as they want to (as they also did with Burke, Quinn and whoever else gets a job with the Leafs) None of that has translated into Cups and unless or until it does I'm not even thinking about them, let alone caring about what they do.
...
Dave Hodge sums it up pretty succinctly:
"The hiring of Mike Babcock is further proof of Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment's need and ability to land the biggest name available.
You can't imagine long meetings to evaluate lesser-known candidates when there's one well-known superstar on the horizon. That's the one MLSE must have and knows it can get. So Brian Burke, Randy Carlyle, Brendan Shanahan, Masai Ujiri, Tim Leiweke, and various soccer managers and players too numerous to list, preceded Babcock to Toronto as if by decree. Money talks, power acts, Toronto beckons, and it's all so predictable.
There's nothing wrong with that, but before it warrants a "thumbs up", the teams owned by MLSE have to win. Obviously, the best of the best can be hired without a lot of opposition from rival organizations, but games have to be won differently. Babcock will not only be trying to win Toronto's first Stanley Cup since 1967, he will attempt to prove that MLSE's might and clout and sprawling reach can be helpful in the pursuit of victory. As yet, there is no proof of that.
Instead, it can be suggested that MLSE's teams suffer from the over-confidence that oozes from a corporation that gets its way in every other way."