Page 592 of 696 FirstFirst ... 92492542582590591592593594602642692 ... LastLast
Results 11,821 to 11,840 of 13909

Thread: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

  1. #11821
    Legend HabsFan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Fort McMurray, Canada
    Posts
    9,627
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by Habsy View Post
    Yzerman was willing to do it for a signed Shattenkirk and you think Juulsen would do it?

    Not likely IMO.
    I said plus. It would have to include more talented guys as well obviously.

  2. #11822
    Legend Sal_Butera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Here, there & everywhere
    Posts
    52,832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Firiedman in his 30-thoughts mentions Bylsma's assistant who ran the #1 PP in the NHL this year Bob Woods is unsure of his future with Sabres going forward...


    “We haven’t reached the ultimate, of where you walk into the building and you can sort of smell victory. But we’re a step closer to that this year than we were last year.”


    “So now the pressure’s on to replicate.”
    - Geoff Molson

  3. #11823
    Wrong Thinker Extraordinaire Habsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Forum ICE
    Posts
    141,676
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Let's try him out.
    #FireJulien#FireMarcBergevin Burn Geoff Molson in effigy! #worstmanagementstaffever

  4. #11824
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,154
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal_Butera View Post
    Firiedman in his 30-thoughts mentions Bylsma's assistant who ran the #1 PP in the NHL this year Bob Woods is unsure of his future with Sabres going forward...
    I want his ex GM to run our draft and development team first .

  5. #11825
    Legend Sal_Butera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Here, there & everywhere
    Posts
    52,832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Could a Hanafin + Teravainen for Galchenyuk + pick/prospect deal be feasible?


    “We haven’t reached the ultimate, of where you walk into the building and you can sort of smell victory. But we’re a step closer to that this year than we were last year.”


    “So now the pressure’s on to replicate.”
    - Geoff Molson

  6. #11826
    The Artist Formerly Known as chiggins. CH1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    40,259
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Shattenkirk has looked awful by the way. A turnover machine on the PP and hasn't looked overall.
    Some GMs get you to the playoffs and some GMs get you through the playoffs.

  7. #11827
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,154
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by CH1 View Post
    Shattenkirk has looked awful by the way. A turnover machine on the PP and hasn't looked overall.
    I was at 2 Leaf games and he stinks , any team giving him term is nuts. Blues were glad to unload him .

  8. #11828
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    17,154
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal_Butera View Post
    Could a Hanafin + Teravainen for Galchenyuk + pick/prospect deal be feasible?
    Wouldn't mind Hanafin on our team .....

  9. #11829
    Legend BKerr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    38,676
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Shattenkirk is a lot like Petry 2.0 for me. He's a second pair defenceman, who adds offense and puck moving. But he's not a true number 1 guy and will make some glaring defensive mistakes from time-to-time. Shattenkirk is better of course, but he's not in the elite territory that some have put him. Pietrangelo was always the Blues top guy.

  10. #11830
    Canadiens Moderator DonKay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    50,809
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by BKerr View Post
    Shattenkirk is a lot like Petry 2.0 for me. He's a second pair defenceman, who adds offense and puck moving. But he's not a true number 1 guy and will make some glaring defensive mistakes from time-to-time. Shattenkirk is better of course, but he's not in the elite territory that some have put him. Pietrangelo was always the Blues top guy.
    Which is likely why St.Louis was not adamant about keeping him despite being a playoff boumd team.
    Go Habs Go!

  11. #11831
    Legend BKerr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    38,676
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by DonKay View Post
    Which is likely why St.Louis was not adamant about keeping him despite being a playoff boumd team.
    St louis wasnt a sure playoff team at the time and had no goaltending. Im not sure they knew that LA would fall apart and Jake Allen would look like an aol world goalie to be fair. They figured even if they got in it was one and done. The Blues thought this year was a right off and then they got a hot goalie out of nowhere.

  12. #11832
    Legend Habs-25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    SJ
    Posts
    13,170
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Yes, he is not a top pairing guy, this playoff probably will cost him couple millions, but still he should be able to cash around 6 millions on 5 or 6 years deal.

  13. #11833
    Legend HabsFan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Fort McMurray, Canada
    Posts
    9,627
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by BKerr View Post
    Shattenkirk is a lot like Petry 2.0 for me. He's a second pair defenceman, who adds offense and puck moving. But he's not a true number 1 guy and will make some glaring defensive mistakes from time-to-time. Shattenkirk is better of course, but he's not in the elite territory that some have put him. Pietrangelo was always the Blues top guy.
    Yeah I have a lot of friends who are leaf fans and they really don't want the leafs to go after him. As you said Pietrangelo is the blues top guy.

  14. #11834
    Wrong Thinker Extraordinaire Habsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Forum ICE
    Posts
    141,676
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by Sal_Butera View Post
    Could a Hanafin + Teravainen for Galchenyuk + pick/prospect deal be feasible?
    I wouldn't do that deal
    #FireJulien#FireMarcBergevin Burn Geoff Molson in effigy! #worstmanagementstaffever

  15. #11835
    Legend BKerr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    38,676
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    I wouldn't either. Not interested in downgrading at forward to add on defence right now.

  16. #11836
    Canadiens Moderator DonKay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    50,809
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by BKerr View Post
    St louis wasnt a sure playoff team at the time and had no goaltending. Im not sure they knew that LA would fall apart and Jake Allen would look like an aol world goalie to be fair. They figured even if they got in it was one and done. The Blues thought this year was a right off and then they got a hot goalie out of nowhere.
    Well they weren't sellers at the deadline...they moved Shattenkirk because they knew full well that their team wouldn't be worse without him.
    Go Habs Go!

  17. #11837
    Legend BKerr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    38,676
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    I think they moved shattenkirk cause after all the ufas they lost for nothing the last three years they couldnt lose one more. And they had no idea they could go on a run

  18. #11838
    Legend Habs4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    41,605
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by Habsy View Post
    I wouldn't do that deal
    Quote Originally Posted by BKerr View Post
    I wouldn't either. Not interested in downgrading at forward to add on defence right now.
    I would do it... IF you already locked down Shipachyov and another top 6 forward via trade/FA.

  19. #11839
    Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    66,128
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by Habs4Life View Post
    I would do it... IF you already locked down Shipachyov and another top 6 forward via trade/FA.
    I agree.

  20. #11840
    Legend Habs4Life's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    41,605
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

    Also if reports are true that Radulov/Bergevin already have a deal in place... I do everything in my power to get Kovalchuks rights. Almost all your issues would be resolved before the damn draft!

    Max/Shipachyov/Radulov
    Kovalchuk/Danault/Gallagher
    Byron/Shaw/Lehkonen
    Teravainen/Hudon/McCarron

    Hanifin-Weber
    Markov-Sergachev
    Benn-Petry

Page 592 of 696 FirstFirst ... 92492542582590591592593594602642692 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •