• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2021-22 Edition

Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

worm said:
which usually mean goaltending

.942
Click to expand...
Partially true, however goalies don't score goals and Vegas has one of the best offense in the league. They are also 20-8-2 when Fleury is not playing.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

GrandWazoo said:
Partially true, however goalies don't score goals and Vegas has one of the best offense in the league. They are also 20-8-2 when Fleury is not playing.
Click to expand...

they do not score goals (well outside of empty netters) but they do let the offense take some chances that might be ill advised if the goalie isnt great

imagine how good they would be if they didnt have to play their 4th stringer

also if they had a decent PP
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

Vegas has a real coach who the Habs had in their Hands! They will be fine next year too!
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

Yeah, it's a shame that they couldn't hire the Anglo with the French name.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

worm said:
they do not score goals (well outside of empty netters) but they do let the offense take some chances that might be ill advised if the goalie isnt great

imagine how good they would be if they didnt have to play their 4th stringer

also if they had a decent PP
Click to expand...
Is that why we always had one of the best offense in the league with Price?
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

Apparently Nashville and St.Louis are the front runners for Max.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

Wouldn't be surprised if LA or SJ slide in the mix too
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

I am fairly sure Montreal is the front runners for Max. Not going anywhere this year.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

Our GM wouldn't be wrong in thinking that trading the only legit goal scorer on the team when we cannot score goals is problematic.

That being said, his family says he expects him to be traded.

Bergevin picked him over Subban in the alleged spat of 2016, he is so stubborn, trading him now looks like an admission of his own stupidity.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

TheCountofMonteCristo said:
Our GM wouldn't be wrong in thinking that trading the only legit goal scorer on the team when we cannot score goals is problematic.

That being said, his family says he expects him to be traded.

Bergevin picked him over Subban in the alleged spat of 2016, he is so stubborn, trading him now looks like an admission of his own stupidity.
Click to expand...

With all the hype i could not blame his family for thinking that. But unless someone is willing to part with a number one center he is going no where... at least this year
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

Habs53 said:
With all the hype i could not blame his family for thinking that. But unless someone is willing to part with a number one center he is going no where... at least this year
Click to expand...

Yeah, if we trade our top D man, top prospect and top winger and do not get a 1 centre back, our GM will look even more stupid than he already does.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition

TheCountofMonteCristo said:
Yeah, if we trade our top D man, top prospect and top winger and do not get a 1 centre back, our GM will look even more stupid than he already does.
Click to expand...

Well get ready for him to looking more stupid. As he will not get a #1 C for Pacs. Remember MB says they are not traded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top