Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2017-18 Edition
Excellent post Sal
I don't blame MB for losing Radu or Markov , they were offered fair deals .
We needed go to closer to 8 mil to offset the taxes for Radu but offered 5 years . Markov was only staying in this league if we or another team offered 2 years and he didn't get it.
We simply need be top shelf elite at the draft and development as this is the most logical approach to getting and retaining talent .
No correlation IMO. It wasn't lack of cap space that kept MB from signing Radulov, it was philosophical, MB wasn't going beyond his BAFO (max 5yr term & $) - likewise Markov. We may choose to agree or disagree with MBs position, but point remains, it wasn't Shaw's contract (or lack of cap space) that prevented the Radulov signing.
Which is why I've been adamant about my position - the past is usually a view into the future. The Habs have not & will not (future tense!) lose out on a top notch talent due to a Shaw type signing, and the Habs org knows this, which is why they're relegated to the Shaw type Plan Fs. Unless CBA changes overnight eliminating NTC/NMC, top end players with clauses will not waive for Mtl (with possible exception of those of the past their prime type player variety), and unless this org gets off its ass and focuses on improving its amateur scouting proficiency to find the albeit very rare Parayko's of the world, they will not be able to swing a slam dunk deal addressing an area of need (I.e Jones for Johansen type deal) without experiencing a void in their system while swinging a meaningful deal (i.e Drouin for Sergachev).
Excellent post Sal
I don't blame MB for losing Radu or Markov , they were offered fair deals .
We needed go to closer to 8 mil to offset the taxes for Radu but offered 5 years . Markov was only staying in this league if we or another team offered 2 years and he didn't get it.
We simply need be top shelf elite at the draft and development as this is the most logical approach to getting and retaining talent .