• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2021-22 Edition

Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Sergachev won't be traded . . . not for Drouin, not for anyone. Our top two d-men have a combined age of about 70.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Habsy said:
Yzerman was willing to do it for a signed Shattenkirk and you think Juulsen would do it?

Not likely IMO.
Click to expand...

I said plus. It would have to include more talented guys as well obviously.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Firiedman in his 30-thoughts mentions Bylsma's assistant who ran the #1 PP in the NHL this year Bob Woods is unsure of his future with Sabres going forward...
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Sal_Butera said:
Firiedman in his 30-thoughts mentions Bylsma's assistant who ran the #1 PP in the NHL this year Bob Woods is unsure of his future with Sabres going forward...
Click to expand...

I want his ex GM to run our draft and development team first .
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Could a Hanafin + Teravainen for Galchenyuk + pick/prospect deal be feasible?
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Shattenkirk has looked awful by the way. A turnover machine on the PP and hasn't looked overall.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

CH1 said:
Shattenkirk has looked awful by the way. A turnover machine on the PP and hasn't looked overall.
Click to expand...

I was at 2 Leaf games and he stinks , any team giving him term is nuts. Blues were glad to unload him .
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Shattenkirk is a lot like Petry 2.0 for me. He's a second pair defenceman, who adds offense and puck moving. But he's not a true number 1 guy and will make some glaring defensive mistakes from time-to-time. Shattenkirk is better of course, but he's not in the elite territory that some have put him. Pietrangelo was always the Blues top guy.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

BKerr said:
Shattenkirk is a lot like Petry 2.0 for me. He's a second pair defenceman, who adds offense and puck moving. But he's not a true number 1 guy and will make some glaring defensive mistakes from time-to-time. Shattenkirk is better of course, but he's not in the elite territory that some have put him. Pietrangelo was always the Blues top guy.
Click to expand...

Which is likely why St.Louis was not adamant about keeping him despite being a playoff boumd team.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

DonKay said:
Which is likely why St.Louis was not adamant about keeping him despite being a playoff boumd team.
Click to expand...
St louis wasnt a sure playoff team at the time and had no goaltending. Im not sure they knew that LA would fall apart and Jake Allen would look like an aol world goalie to be fair. They figured even if they got in it was one and done. The Blues thought this year was a right off and then they got a hot goalie out of nowhere.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

Yes, he is not a top pairing guy, this playoff probably will cost him couple millions, but still he should be able to cash around 6 millions on 5 or 6 years deal.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

BKerr said:
Shattenkirk is a lot like Petry 2.0 for me. He's a second pair defenceman, who adds offense and puck moving. But he's not a true number 1 guy and will make some glaring defensive mistakes from time-to-time. Shattenkirk is better of course, but he's not in the elite territory that some have put him. Pietrangelo was always the Blues top guy.
Click to expand...

Yeah I have a lot of friends who are leaf fans and they really don't want the leafs to go after him. As you said Pietrangelo is the blues top guy.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

I wouldn't either. Not interested in downgrading at forward to add on defence right now.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

BKerr said:
St louis wasnt a sure playoff team at the time and had no goaltending. Im not sure they knew that LA would fall apart and Jake Allen would look like an aol world goalie to be fair. They figured even if they got in it was one and done. The Blues thought this year was a right off and then they got a hot goalie out of nowhere.
Click to expand...

Well they weren't sellers at the deadline...they moved Shattenkirk because they knew full well that their team wouldn't be worse without him.
 
Re: Rumours, Innuendos and Flat out B.S.: 2016-17 Edition

I think they moved shattenkirk cause after all the ufas they lost for nothing the last three years they couldnt lose one more. And they had no idea they could go on a run
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top