Bracco probably has more upside, but Brown is further along in his development and the numbers the past 2 years look great. At this point in time, I have him slightly ahead.
Since 2009/10, 40 games minimum, PPG:
Logan Couture: 1.27
Kyle Palmieri: 1.13
Luke Adam: 1.08
JT Miller: 1.05
Ryan Spooner: .97
Tyler Ennis: .94
Naz Kadri: .93
Jason Zucker: .91
Brett Connolly: .89
Markus Granlund: .89
Tyler Toffoli: .88
Alex khokhlachev: .88
Colin Wilson: .85
Brandon Pirri: .85
Peter Holland: .85
Mikhael Grigorenko: .84
Kyle Turris .83
Ryan Johansen: .83
Tomas Tatar: .81
Lars Eller: .81
Sven Bartschi: .81
Richard Rakell: .80
Connor Brown: .80
Lucas Lessio: .78
Some very good, pretty good and less than good names in there.
Something to remember here is that the AHL has turned into a dead puck league over the last ~2 seasons and a lot of the seasons listed above were in the first few seasons of the range I chose.
He's done good things but seeing the lists of players who've done what Bracco's done in the USNTDP and the list of players who've done what Brown has, Bracco's numbers seem to stand out as special, I'm not sure Brown's do.
Yeah I know. Next year I'll probably say differently cause I imagine Bracco having a great year. Right now this second I gotta give it to Brown.
He's done good things but seeing the lists of players who've done what Bracco's done in the USNTDP and the list of players who've done what Brown has, Bracco's numbers seem to stand out as special, I'm not sure Brown's do.
This I agree with to an extent. Though I caution taking Bracco's numbers at face value (as I argued with LM about), they're still impressive regardless, when viewed in what I believe to be their proper context. Brown's AHL numbers are encouraging in part because of how unheralded a prospect he was, but we're talking about numbers matched or somewhat bettered by guys who are just okay NHL'ers like Holland, Granlund, Pirri, etc....and Brown doesn't bring a whole pile of other things to the plate with him either. His offensively ability is the best thing about him as a prospect and it's limited (though still potentially quite good...there's nothing wrong with a guy having a 55-60 point ceiling) where Bracco's is a lot less limited because of better tools. Better skater at 18, better hands, vision, etc. Brown has done an awesome job at scraping every bit of ability he has out of his personal toolkit, but we're pretty damn close to as good as he's going to get.
How come?
Not that I agree with it the outlook personally, but I can see where someone would prefer the 55 point upside player whose proximity to the league and their ultimate upside is much closer than the 75 point upside player who is way further away from getting there.
Not that I agree with it the outlook personally, but I can see where someone would prefer the 55 point upside player whose proximity to the league and their ultimate upside is much closer than the 75 point upside player who is way further away from getting there.
I think its also safe to say that Brown has the higher floor & odds of being a contributor at the NHL.....while Bracco....as electrifying as his upside is, also has a very legit chance (in part because as you say, he's much further away from the show) of never making it.
It wouldn't be my preference, but I can definitely see a very fair argument for ranking Brown over Bracco atm.
I would often go for upside in a case like this (every player evaluation is different), but in this case while I agree that Brown definitely has the higher floor, he also has a comparable upside IMO. For best-case-scenario ceiling, it's Bracco no question, but it's far from guaranteed that he continues to put up similar numbers against tougher competition or even gets to the show. And Brown does have intriguing upside in his own right.
As others have said, it's quite possible we will all rank Bracco higher in a year or two, and neither guy is a "bad" pick in this spot.