JohnnyHolmes
Banned
I'm sorry Pretend Karl didn't make it this year.
I'm sorry Pretend Karl didn't make it this year.
Pretty sad that your bigotry can't even allow you to refer to a black man by his name.
Doughty shouldn't win it either. Burns should win it.
Karlsson should win it. There is nobody in his class.
Maybe Letang too if he didn't miss games.Except for Burns this year.
Except for Burns this year.
Is that like how you and Holmes talk about Subban you denigrate him for being black and being on the Canadiens?View attachment 4117
Except he wasn't.
Karlsson 82 > Burns 75 (stuff your primary points BS where the sun doesn't shine)
Karlsson 4th in NHL in scoring > Burns at 11th (Burns on a higher scoring team)
Karlsson -2 on a team with -8 goal differential> Burns at -5 on a team with +33 goal differential
Karlsson 21 more points than his next teammate > Burns 3rd on his team in scoring with 7 less points than the leader.
http://public.tableau.com/shared/NG8T29764?:display_count=yes
Karlsson is a generational talent and had a monster season. If he was a Leaf or Hab the positive press he'd get would be endless. Since he's a Sens player and not Canadian we get campaigns to steal his awards and give them to lesser D men.
Karlsson 82 > Burns 75 (stuff your primary points BS where the sun doesn't shine)
Karlsson 4th in NHL in scoring > Burns at 11th (Burns on a higher scoring team)
Karlsson -2 on a team with -8 goal differential> Burns at -5 on a team with +33 goal differential
Karlsson 21 more points than his next teammate > Burns 3rd on his team in scoring with 7 less points than the leader.
Karlsson is a generational talent and had a monster season. If he was a Leaf or Hab the positive press he'd get would be endless. Since he's a Sens player and not Canadian we get campaigns to steal his awards and give them to lesser D men.
When you bring +/- into a discussion on THIS board, you've already lost the argument. Serious fail there, SENSIBLE.
Except he was.
26 > 16
Karlsson had a lot more secondary assists. Burns had a lot more goals.
Want a 2nd opinion? Hockeyref's Point Share
Burns 12.7
Karlsson 11.9
They rank Burn's season as superior to Karlsson's. That's with both tying in their "goals created" metric at 27, which takes team scoring into account.
Hooray for points
Context is awesome...just because you don't like the fact that Burns had a worse +/- on a team with a MUCH better goal differential, doesn't mean you get to pretend it is meaningless.+/-. Awesome
What's the difference if the offence on the club is compressed or spread out? It's Burns fault that Ottawa's best forward wouldn't make the first line in SJ?
Post some linked data to support this claim.Burns had a better year.
I put it in to show how stupid it was when you first did it...only you could be dense enough not to see that.You want to drag 3 year numbers into this (after shitting on them previously, which is oh so very you), have at it. I've shown you the goal suppression numbers from this season.
Let it sink in....the Sens allowed more goals per minute with Karlsson on the ice than with Cowen, Borowiecki, whoever. Last out of 8 defenders who qualified among the Sens group. That's ****ing dreadful defensive work, you don't get to blame your shitty blueline for dragging him down when he was worse than the lot of them.
Sens need Karl to win. It's the only thing they're going to have for a very long time.