Deckie007
Well-known member
I like the idea of outright dropping those not protected. They can still be drafted or picked up as a FA.
I'd be cool with that too. Maybe not 5, but 2 or 3? Yeah, I'd be fine with that.
I like the idea of outright dropping those not protected. They can still be drafted or picked up as a FA.
We're already pushing the definition of "dynasty league." If we protect many less it's just a "keeper league."
We keep 20 with a 25 man farm team. That's as Dynasty as it gets.
I modeled the baseball league after this one. I liked the adhoc free agency it provides. Other option is to just reduce the bench spots to 3 from 5 which would line up with the NHL. I'd actually really like that tbhOf all the dynasty leagues I've been in, only this and the baseball league have protected lists. Every other one I'm in or have been in you keep your entire roster.
I'm not complaining (though I'd like to lessen the amount that can be taken to 1 or 2), just saying that if you have to "unprotect" more players it's going to become more of a keeper league than a dynasty league.
I modeled the baseball league after this one. I liked the adhoc free agency it provides. Other option is to just reduce the bench spots to 3 from 5 which would line up with the NHL. I'd actually really like that tbh