Any concerns Buffalo gets real tough to deal with afterwards?
Standings of Reality
- Thread starter zeke
- Start date
I'd be worried Edmonton becoming a juggernaut
Yeah if he is landing in the East, I'd prefer Detroit too. Not too scared of them.
zeke
Well-known member
sure. but I like our rivals being good, tbh.
MyNameIsJonas
Well-known member
Keep on slipping Blackhawks.
I don't think Crawford id ready to come out of the dark room yet, hasn't finished his Alphagetti or spelled concussion out of his Zoodles.
MyNameIsJonas
Well-known member
From a pure hard luck deserves it standpoint he should go to Buffalo.
Please no Edmonton, following that no Canadian teams.
Please no Edmonton, following that no Canadian teams.
Bleedsblue&white
Well-known member
It's sad...since The Leafs moved, we have not had Montreal, Toronto and Ottawa all doing well at the same time. Weird even.
zeke
Well-known member
ATL
1.TBL 116
2.BOS 115
3.TOR 103
-------------
4.FLA 84
5.DET 81
6.MTL 76
7.OTT 71
8.BUF 62
MET
1.WSH 104
2.PHI 95
3.PIT 95
-------------
4.NJD 92*
5.CBJ 90*
6.CAR 89
7.NYR 86
8.NYI 86
CEN
1.NSH 114
2.WPG 107
3.DAL 101
-------------
4.STL 100*
5.MIN 98*
6.COL 95
7.CHI 82
PAC
1.VGK 113
2.SJS 100
3.LAK 97
-------------
4.CGY 97
5.ANA 94
6.EDM 75
7.VAN 73
8.ARZ 56
NHL
1.TBL 116
2.BOS 115
3.NSH 114
4.VGK 113
5.WPG 107
6 WSH 104
7.TOR 103
8.DAL 101
9.STL 100
10.SJS 100
11.MIN 98
12.LAK 97
13.CGY 97
14.COL 95
15.PHI 95
16.PIT 95
17.ANA 94
18.NJD 92
19.CBJ 90
20.CAR 89
21.NYR 86
22.NYI 86
23.FLA 84
24.CHI 82
25.DET 81
26.MTL 76
27.EDM 75
28.VAN 73
29.OTT 71
30.BUF 62
31.ARZ 56
1.TBL 116
2.BOS 115
3.TOR 103
-------------
4.FLA 84
5.DET 81
6.MTL 76
7.OTT 71
8.BUF 62
MET
1.WSH 104
2.PHI 95
3.PIT 95
-------------
4.NJD 92*
5.CBJ 90*
6.CAR 89
7.NYR 86
8.NYI 86
CEN
1.NSH 114
2.WPG 107
3.DAL 101
-------------
4.STL 100*
5.MIN 98*
6.COL 95
7.CHI 82
PAC
1.VGK 113
2.SJS 100
3.LAK 97
-------------
4.CGY 97
5.ANA 94
6.EDM 75
7.VAN 73
8.ARZ 56
NHL
1.TBL 116
2.BOS 115
3.NSH 114
4.VGK 113
5.WPG 107
6 WSH 104
7.TOR 103
8.DAL 101
9.STL 100
10.SJS 100
11.MIN 98
12.LAK 97
13.CGY 97
14.COL 95
15.PHI 95
16.PIT 95
17.ANA 94
18.NJD 92
19.CBJ 90
20.CAR 89
21.NYR 86
22.NYI 86
23.FLA 84
24.CHI 82
25.DET 81
26.MTL 76
27.EDM 75
28.VAN 73
29.OTT 71
30.BUF 62
31.ARZ 56
zeke
Well-known member
ATL
1.BOS 116
2.TBL 114
3.TOR 103
-------------
4.FLA 84
5.DET 82
6.MTL 76
7.OTT 70
8.BUF 63
MET
1.WSH 104
2.PIT 96
3.PHI 95
-------------
4.NJD 94*
5.CBJ 91*
6.CAR 91
7.NYR 85
8.NYI 85
CEN
1.NSH 115
2.WPG 108
3.DAL 101
-------------
4.STL 100*
5.MIN 100*
6.COL 95
7.CHI 81
PAC
1.VGK 114
2.SJS 98
3.LAK 95
-------------
4.CGY 95
5.ANA 92
6.EDM 75
7.VAN 73
8.ARZ 58
NHL
1.BOS 116
2.NSH 115
3.VGK 114
4.TBL 114
5.WPG 108
6 WSH 104
7.TOR 103
8.DAL 101
9.STL 100
10.MIN 100
11.SJS 98
12.PIT 96
13.COL 95
14.LAK 95
15.PHI 95
16.CGY 95
17.NJD 94
18.ANA 92
19.CBJ 91
20.CAR 91
21.NYR 85
22.NYI 85
23.FLA 84
24.DET 82
25.CHI 81
26.MTL 76
27.EDM 75
28.VAN 73
29.OTT 70
30.BUF 63
31.ARZ 58
1.BOS 116
2.TBL 114
3.TOR 103
-------------
4.FLA 84
5.DET 82
6.MTL 76
7.OTT 70
8.BUF 63
MET
1.WSH 104
2.PIT 96
3.PHI 95
-------------
4.NJD 94*
5.CBJ 91*
6.CAR 91
7.NYR 85
8.NYI 85
CEN
1.NSH 115
2.WPG 108
3.DAL 101
-------------
4.STL 100*
5.MIN 100*
6.COL 95
7.CHI 81
PAC
1.VGK 114
2.SJS 98
3.LAK 95
-------------
4.CGY 95
5.ANA 92
6.EDM 75
7.VAN 73
8.ARZ 58
NHL
1.BOS 116
2.NSH 115
3.VGK 114
4.TBL 114
5.WPG 108
6 WSH 104
7.TOR 103
8.DAL 101
9.STL 100
10.MIN 100
11.SJS 98
12.PIT 96
13.COL 95
14.LAK 95
15.PHI 95
16.CGY 95
17.NJD 94
18.ANA 92
19.CBJ 91
20.CAR 91
21.NYR 85
22.NYI 85
23.FLA 84
24.DET 82
25.CHI 81
26.MTL 76
27.EDM 75
28.VAN 73
29.OTT 70
30.BUF 63
31.ARZ 58
.928 isn't all that unsustainable. Vasilevskiy is definitely capable of sustaining something close to that.
BeLeafer
Well-known member
.928 might be sustainable (in theory), but that's not what I was referring to. He posted .935 prior to the new year. That is unsustainable. Since the new year, he's been .912 to bring him down to .928 overall.
His 2018 numbers are much more in line with his career numbers than his fall results. Prior to this season, Vasilevsky's career sv% was .915. He's presently regressing to the mean and he's got a fair bit more regressing to do.
.928 has gotten them to this point. Theoretically if his sv% is .928 by the end of the season, their record should be about what it is now.
Of course... if he'd maintained a .935 they'd have continued to dominate. But now that it's "down" to .928 they're only at .667 win %. Their record is what it is in part to the slide that happened when he was putting up a .912 for awhile. If he puts up a .928 the rest of the way, they'll likely finish right around where they are now.
I mean, not to be condescending... but we all know that a .928 sv% doesn't consist of week after week and month after month of .928 sv% and a .667 win % each week and each month.
You'll have stretches of .935 sv% and a .720 win %. Then you'll have stretches of .912 sv% and a .520 win %.