Darling's leakier. and puts pucks into his own net.Trivia question: what’s the difference between Darling and an empty net?
Answer: not a lot
Darling's leakier. and puts pucks into his own net.Trivia question: what’s the difference between Darling and an empty net?
Answer: not a lot
Darling is atrocious...and Peters is not much better.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Trivia question: what’s the difference between Darling and an empty net?
Answer: not a lot
The canes lost because Zykov didn’t get his hat trick. If he’d had it the canes would have been tied and gone into OT and in zykovs 5 second appearance, accidental, he would have scored sending jubilations up and down peace street.
Trivia question: what’s the difference between Darling and an empty net?
Answer: not a lot
This team is a freaking joke.
Serious question, how bad does it have to get before they realize that Darling is an anchor that needs to be sent far, far away from this team? You simply cannot even consider that to be anything close to an option in net moving forward.
What does this team, system, or environment do to goalies. Could Darling have been this bad in Chicago? Did Lack lack fundamentals in Vancouver? Understand that backup duties are different than starting, but guys come here and look like they forgot how to play. And then it takes them several years to get their confidence back (Khudobin is finally playing well in a backup role again).
Do we change the way goalies play? Does our "system" force them out of their zone? Tripp rants about us wanting Darling to play the puck more. Could worrying about that destroy the rest of his habits?
Is our system optimized for Cam Ward to look good for 1 month out of every year and then be mediocre the rest of the time, while making the other goalie look like an emergency backup forced to play?
Does anyone really believe that Scott Darling is going to suddenly look like a steady, reliable NHL starter no matter where he plays if he continues to play the kinda hockey he has this season?