Pacioretty
- Thread starter hairnova
- Start date
Guibs
Well-known member
What I meant is if we have a bigger return, we need to trade him now. He has more value if he comes with a full year than just a playoff run.
Demon Blond
Active member
Sure but you can get futures in a deal. For example if Max signs an extension we get a 1st rounder.
Exactly , they knew this day was coming. You have to know if you are going to sign this guy or not .
Another colossal fckup in the life of the hab regimes
They didn't know. MB didn't realize that losing Radulov and Markov would be a big deal.
Sure they did HP . You observe your roster , strengths and weaknesses and act accordingly.
This was simply piss poor asset management at its finest .
He knew well in advance Radu testing the market in the summer meant overpay or walk away
Markov was simply a year to year player , you dont decide about 67 based on a near 40 year old close to retirement .
Look around the league . Decisions were made well in advance such as Doughty resigning or the Rangers retooling and dumping players for assets .
There was no doubt 27 for example was a goner at some point .
There was no excuse to drag this 67 charade and now the embarrassment of having him traded and or shopped around for months and this report we will not extend him.
Habsy
Yes, I'm kidding people.
If he didn’t realize that he should have been fired on the spot.
Exactly
You give MB too much credit.
CaptainBolduke
Active member
Meh. He's not part of the future. He can be moved too. His "leadership" has not come as advertised.
worm
Well-known member
depends
teams can get stupid around deadline time
i mean look how we got max is the first place.....him and gorges for rivet
erat got the preds forsberg
tatar got a first, second, third round picks
worm
Well-known member
i sure did
i said we trading our best prospect to be a worse team
i had little interest in the team from the start last year
worm
Well-known member
Habs53
Active member
Both are worth at least first rounders and then some
CaptainBolduke
Active member
I don't think anyone is disputing that they have value. I think there are differing opinions on when/if their value is it's highest or lowest.
Like Weber was probably more valuable before he hurt both his legs -- but that doesn't mean he has no value. I'm not sure what his comparisons are.
Habsy
Yes, I'm kidding people.
Well conversely, Weber will be worth a heck of a lot more when he returns. Teams knew Weber had issues with his foot and knee already, that isn't new. When he returns and shows he's fine his stock will skyrocket.
With MB as G.M, at his salary and contract remaining, he better do more than fine for us to get anything valuable back. This is MB we're talking about, he'll probably target an even older dman in return because we're still competing for the playoffs lol.