GrandWazoo
Well-known member
That draft year didn’t have elite talent but enough good talent.
When you draft #1 in that scenario and your player is a bust and out of the league so soon
you fooked up .
You can question the Oils development team but he should of been a top 6 player in this
league.
He was traded in his early 20’s there was plenty of time to turn his career around .
The Nuge draft a year before also lacked elite talent but at least RNH has developed into a very good player.
Domi , Dylan Strome , and others are turning around their careers at an early age with a change of scenery.
I don’t think Nails gave a shit about putting in the commitment to succeed like Grigorenko .
There are many examples of players who were drafted in the top 5 who never developed into stars but at least were productive players and not out of the league by 25 .
They picked the BPA in the draft at the time, there is little question about it.
He actually had a decent season post draft, both in the KHL and the NHL.
But then they go the horrible Dallas Eakins as head coach and the next 2 seasons were disaster for both the Oilers and Yakupov. He was all over the lineup and never really got the coaching that was so critical at this stage of his development. And Yakupov needed a lot of work, he was a great goal scorer, but his defensive game was poor and his overall understanding of the game needed tuning. Once he lost his goal scoring bearings, he became mostly useless.
They should have brought him slowly and help him develop both his offensive skills and rounding up his defensive game in the minors instead of rushing him in the NHL. Maybe with a different coach than Eakins it could have worked but by the time he was 23, he was ruined. A goal scorer that shoots 7% and can't play defense is not really useful to any team.