worm
Well-known member
Not many I'd take ahead of Hughesit's not untrue...conversely, if I could add any dman to the Habs, Hughes would not be one of my top picks because I already have Hutson
Not many I'd take ahead of Hughesit's not untrue...conversely, if I could add any dman to the Habs, Hughes would not be one of my top picks because I already have Hutson
Bingoit's not untrue...conversely, if I could add any dman to the Habs, Hughes would not be one of my top picks because I already have Hutson
That's great. Hutson is a better and more impactful player.LaCombe is the full package , Jake Sanderson type
I'd be fine with Hughes and Hutson on the same team. We'd control the puck 50 minutes per game.it's not untrue...conversely, if I could add any dman to the Habs, Hughes would not be one of my top picks because I already have Hutson
Last 10 min of every game, one is on iceI'd be fine with Hughes and Hutson on the same team. We'd control the puck 50 minutes per game.
He's unfortunately lost his marbles, Maybe because his son's a gay. j/kExcept Celebrini made the team so he makes no sense.
He's unfortunately lost his marbles, Maybe because his son's a gay. j/k
LaCombe is the full package , Jake Sanderson type
I agree. But LaCombe might be better than Seth Jones.Jake Sanderson is quite a bit better, IMO
Harvard Law suggests otherwise. On the other hand, he gave Mike Komisarek a huge contract (for that time) so maybe he was always a dodo.1. From Boston
2. Worked for the Leafs
3. Worked for the Canucks
He never had any marbles to lose.
He always overvalued big slow dudesHarvard Law suggests otherwise. On the other hand, he gave Mike Komisarek a huge contract (for that time) so maybe he was always a dodo.
And "truculence."He always overvalued big slow dudes
He was run out of Vancouver too.But he did do well in bringing the Sedins to Vancouver.