honestly he doesn't deserve near mitch money.
I've literally posted those numbers over and over again from back before anyone signed. I just keep cutting and pasting it over and over again.It's textbook homering. Before Mitch was signed: He isn't worth the money! Now that he's signed: HE'S THE BEST PLAYER EVER AND IS WORTH WAY MORE THAN EVERY OTHER RFA!!!!
It's fine though. No harm in being a homer really. I've seen people treat stocks like they treat sports teams. That shit is when people get burned.
Huh, neither one particularly impressive at es g/60 (down at 2nd line level). I've never really looked into Rantanen's numbers. Puffed up by the powerplay.i haven't really been using g60 much.
just p60 and p1/60.
but lemme look:
Rantanen: ES .73g/60, PP 2.38g/60
Marner: ES .80g/60, PP 1.37g/60
Mitch has actually been the better goalscorer at evens, though Rants has been better at on the PP.