JamesNorthern
Active member
What about
Boychuk/Tlusty E. Staal Semin
Skinner J. Staal Lindholm
Boychuk/Tlusty somebody somebody
somebody Malholtra Dwyer
That's three somebody's up front. Those lines look good and I'd wager if we get the right pieces for lines 3 and 4 - lines 1 and 2 will become more effective. And of course we'd have more options for need to basis (i.e. run one of our bangers up on the top line for a few shifts etc..)
And two somebody's on the back end.
If we can't find a taker and suitable return for Liles, than yeah, you move Murphy for what we need. I'm not at all comfortable going with a defense group that includes ALL of Liles, Muprhy and Sekera. Sekera you keep because he's a really good and effective smallish defenseman. But having half of your defense corps under 6 foot? (ok Sekera is listed at 6 foot)... but this is made worse because none of the other three are particularly physical. I know I hear about Bellemore's progress, I'm not sold. I think he's another example of over slotted and prospering (for now).
Boychuk/Tlusty E. Staal Semin
Skinner J. Staal Lindholm
Boychuk/Tlusty somebody somebody
somebody Malholtra Dwyer
That's three somebody's up front. Those lines look good and I'd wager if we get the right pieces for lines 3 and 4 - lines 1 and 2 will become more effective. And of course we'd have more options for need to basis (i.e. run one of our bangers up on the top line for a few shifts etc..)
And two somebody's on the back end.
If we can't find a taker and suitable return for Liles, than yeah, you move Murphy for what we need. I'm not at all comfortable going with a defense group that includes ALL of Liles, Muprhy and Sekera. Sekera you keep because he's a really good and effective smallish defenseman. But having half of your defense corps under 6 foot? (ok Sekera is listed at 6 foot)... but this is made worse because none of the other three are particularly physical. I know I hear about Bellemore's progress, I'm not sold. I think he's another example of over slotted and prospering (for now).