lecoqsportif
Well-known member
Best team throughout WC won. Kudos.
New definition of soccer. 22 men run and kick a ball around for 90 minutes then France wins
Congrats to France. Still not sure how they managed to turn that game into a blowout, but they got the tactics right enough and were MUCH more opportunistic with their chances. Kudos.
Who cares?
I guess having major possession in a soccer game doesn't mean much if you can't take advantage of your chances
Potentially. That’s a young core.
Corsic?
Sorry, was using the Croatian term for Corsi.
Can Mbappé get any faster, lol
Congrats to France. Still not sure how they managed to turn that game into a blowout, but they got the tactics right enough and were MUCH more opportunistic with their chances. Kudos.
How many Africans are on France anyway?
He could win the 100m in the OlympicsCan Mbappé get any faster, lol
Giroud didn't score but he occupied two guys all the time.Exactamundo.
1. Varane and Umtiti as CDs.
2. Pogba and Kanté right in front of them.
3. A track team up front, with a big target man to hold up the ball and distribute.
How is this not an obvious counterattacking set up? The criticism of Deschamps baffles.
How many Africans are on France anyway?
This question always amuses me. Partly because it's so bloody rare that African teams win anything meaningful outside of Africa. I mean, if African players are what make the difference for France, then you'd think ... say Nigeria would dominate all day every day. Big, developed, relatively wealthy, fairly modern country like that. Maybe what they need is some Frenchmen :0)
BTW ... no shots fired at Habsy because he's hardly the only one wondering.
Preach it brother.Just noticed this.
3 ways to answer it really.
1) 2 guys were born outside of mainland France, one in Cameroon, the other in guadeloupe, which is still part of France. So how many Africans? 1.
2)If you are talking about of African descent, AKA, black, a smaller percentage than the US national basketball team
3) Enough to win the world cup.