CaptainBolduke
Active member
Lupul probably should have been traded 2 years ago when he was at peak value. However, that is hindsight now. I still think he has some value if you decide to move him now.
kevin lowe maybe...i mean in his day they won a lot of cups doing itthough I'd be surprised if Edmonton wasn't...
Sounds like, if true, our kids just have some growing up to do. Which isn't all that unheard of among professional athletes.
But I'm not sure how this growing up process is best facilitated. Do they need some veteran leadership in the room? Trade a couple of the ringleaders?
We were statistically one of the youngest teams in the league this year. So, yes, the whole "being young" thing, is in fact a thing.
Statistics can be flawed for example, you can have several young guys and 3-4 guys who are 40 plus and it makes a team "old", it's flawed to say the least.
Hell look at Chicago, they are a "young team" as well yet they have won 2 cups in the past 4 years, we have barely made the playoff once in that same time frame....
Statistics can be flawed for example, you can have several young guys and 3-4 guys who are 40 plus and it makes a team "old", it's flawed to say the least.
Hell look at Chicago, they are a "young team" as well yet they have won 2 cups in the past 4 years, we have barely made the playoff once in that same time frame....
The 70s and 80s were a long time ago. Players take much better care of themselves than 30-40 years ago. These guys are elite athletes. They can't regularly put poison into their bodies.
You think Stamkos and Crosby are out there partying and blowing through lines a few nights a week?
Taking care of the body is pretty important for a professional athlete that hopes to play 96+ games in 8-9 month span at the highest level in the world over multiple years.
The problem isn't even really the drugs itself. its what it says about a guys commitment if they are out partying enough that it becomes an issue. Hockey isn't just a 3 hour shift job a few nights a week. If you slack off ice it will show up on ice.
if basically the entire team is using coke, partying isn't 'creeping in'.
Maybe they target Dan Boyle in the offseason? Another couple of "vets" Iginla, Morrow, Robidas (if he comes back from another broken leg), Orpik...
Actually, I'm curious pronger...since the general consensus seems to be that 28 is when a defenceman enters his prime, you obviously disagree so what's your take? What about forwards?
Well, we ARE one of the youngest teams though. Unless you are expecting teams full of rookies and sophomores, which do not exist in the NHL, having so many of our players playing in their 3rd - 5th season make us one of the youngest, and unfortunately also most inexperienced teams.That's just it they aren't a bunch of rookies:
Bozak: 28 (5 seasons)
Kessel: 26 (7 seasons)
JVR: 25 (4 seasons)
Kadri: 24 ( 4 seasons)
Lupul: 32 (9 seasons)
Clarkson: 30 (7 seasons)
Raymond: 28 (6 seasons)
Kulemin: 27 (5 seasons)
Mcclement: 31 (8 seasons)
Bolland: 27 (7 seasons)
Orr: 32 (9 seasons)
Phaneuf: 29 (10 seasons)
Gunnarsson: 27 (4 seasons)
Franson:26 (4 seasons)
Rielly: 20 (first season)
Gardiner: 24 (3 seasons)
Gleason: 31 (9 seasons)
Ranger: 30 (5 seasons)
Bernier: 25 (4 seasons)
Riemer: 25(4 seasons)
Outside of a few players this team is one with players in their late 20's to early 30's, the "I am young excuse" just doesn't fly, most of these players should be in the prime of their careers, old enough to know and be better but sadly aren't.
I agree 28/29 is when a blueliner enters his prime, they take a bit longer to get going then forwards do. Average age for forwards? I'd say the prime range is 27-32, there are some exceptions where a foward peaks early and dwindles (Heatley, Cheechoo, Ovie) but in general 27-32 is the range IMO.