• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: The F*cking Science Thread

Anyone have any interest in microbiology? We isolated a CRE today (Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae) today - we don't get see them too often and certainly not at our small hospital. Essentially carbapenems were the type of antibiotics we used as a last resort to treat infections from bacteria that had become resistant to nearly everything else. Now we're seeing bacteria that have developed mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems too. Pretty scary when you think about it.
 
Last edited:
"Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em,
And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum."

Every time I see ad infinitum I remember this ditty.
 
zeno1.jpg
 
The Skylon spaceplane — a single-stage spacecraft design that could cut travel time between any two points on the planet down to less than 4 hours — has received a boost towards its goal of achieving orbit after the European Space Agency (ESA) endorsed one of the key technologies behind the spaceplane's development.
Representatives from Reaction Engines Ltd (REL), the UK company developing Skylon and its Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine (SABRE), tested their breakthrough heat-exchanger technology for a group of ESA experts on Wednesday, who gave their official validation of the results.

"The pre-cooler test objectives have all been successfully met and ESA are satisfied that the tests demonstrate the technology required for the SABRE engine development."

The SABRE engine being developed by REL is basically a rocket engine, like you would have on any of the multi-stage rockets now used to launch things into orbit, with elements of a conventional jet engine added on. This design would allow a spacecraft to take off just like a jet aircraft, fly up to high altitude and reach incredible speeds, switch over to rocket propulsion for achieving orbit, and then switch back to jet propulsion once it re-entered the atmosphere.

Since oxygen is needed for fuel to burn and oxygen becomes increasingly hard to come by the further up in the atmosphere you go, a typical multi-stage rocket, with its 'closed' combustion cycle engines, needs to carry a large supply of liquid oxygen with it. The SABRE engine reduces the need for an on-board liquid oxygen supply by using an air intake system, similar to a jet engine, to suck in air while the plane is at lower altitudes. Only when the plane reaches altitudes where it cannot draw enough oxygen from the air for combustion — after reaching speeds of around Mach 5.5 (over 6,000 km/h) — does it close its air intake valves. The engines then switch over to a small on-board liquid oxygen supply for 'closed' rocket combustion for the rest of the trip.

There were some big problems with this idea in previous designs. Air being injected into the combustion chamber needs to be compressed, and by the laws of thermodynamics, when you compress air it heats up. To reach the speeds needed by this plane, the air would be heated to such a high temperature that it would melt the engine. Cooling the air with a heat-exchanger before it is injected into the combustion chamber was a good solution, but not only are heat-exchangers typically very big and heavy, but they only worked well as long as there wasn't moisture in the air. Any water in the air would condense out when the air was cooled, which would collect as frost on the heat exchanger, clogging it up within moments and making it completely useless.

In the new heat exchanger designed by REL, air with a temperature of over 1,000 °C is drawn through arrays of thin, liquid-fed cooling tubes that are arranged in a highly-efficient spiral formation. The air cools down to minus 150 °C as it flows around these tubes and is drawn out from the centre of the exchanger to be injected into the combustion chamber. The whole design of the exchanger makes it extremely light and compact, and thus perfect for this kind of use.

Now, how did they avoid the buildup of frost in the exchanger? They aren't telling.

"We are not going to tell you how this works," said Richard Varvill, chief engineer for REL, according to The National Post. "It is our most closely guarded secret."

In their effort to keep this knowledge a secret, they are not even filing patents for the new technology. As the company believes that they are the only ones developing this kind of technology, their caution is understandable.

Alan Bond, the founder of REL, said in a statement: "These successful tests represent a fundamental breakthrough in propulsion technology. Reaction Engines' lightweight heat exchangers are going to force a radical re-think of the design of the underlying thermodynamic cycles of aerospace engines. These new cycles will open up completely different operational characteristics such as high Mach cruise and low cost, re-usable space access, as the European Space Agency's validation of Reaction Engines' SABRE engine has confirmed. The REL team has been trying to solve this problem for over 30 years and we've finally done it. Innovation doesn't happen overnight. Independent experts have confirmed that the full engine can now be demonstrated. The SABRE engine has the potential to revolutionise our lives in the 21st century in the way the jet engine did in the 20th Century. This is the proudest moment of my life."

With this hurdle behind them, the company now hopes to raise the funds necessary to have SABRE fully operational and ready for the market within 10 years. They also believe that their heat-exchanger technology will be useful for other applications, such as increasing the fuel efficiency of conventional jet aircraft and multi-stage flash desalination plants.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/geek...space-plane-could-fly-anywhere-182220679.html
 
That's awesome. It seems like improvements in transportation have been few and far between in the last 60 years. Some serious supersonic travel is overdue.

Australia for the long weekend? Why not.
 
That's awesome. It seems like improvements in transportation have been few and far between in the last 60 years. Some serious supersonic travel is overdue.

Australia for the long weekend? Why not.


That's one of the reasons I've always been a big fan of the enclosed maglev train idea. If you can create a sealed tube environment for a maglev train to run in, you can increase it's speed massively. The only friction that limits it's speed at sea level is air....limit the atmosphere it has to fight and they can theoretically achieve speeds of 10,000kph+

Transportation in the future will probably include maglev style trains for continental travel and something like what's in that article for intercontinental, long range travel. Standard air travel for medium to long range travel between non premium markets (Edmonton to Winnipeg for example)
 
I find myself wanting to live to a ripe old age just so I can see what the hell my grandkids will be driving/flying, etc. We're already at public trips into space, give us a few more decades.
 
To celebrate the 40th anniversary of the launch of Apollo 17 — the last manned mission to the Moon — a U.S. company called 'Golden Spike' announced that they will be offering commercial flights to the Moon by the year 2020.

Golden Spike — named after the ceremonial last spike driven to join the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railways to form the First Transcontinental Railroad in 1869 — is a private company founded in 2010 by planetary scientist and former NASA executive Dr. Alan Stern with (according to their website) one objective in mind: "achieving affordable, reliable, and frequent human expeditions to the Moon."

"Our vision is to create a reliable and affordable, US-based commercial human lunar transportation system that enables the exploration of the moon, by humans from virtually any nation, or any corporation, or any individual wishing to accomplish objectives on the moon," said Gerald Griffin, a former flight director for the Apollo space program who sits on the Golden Spike board of directors.

The company plans to provide all the technology and resources for each flight, including crew training, the flight systems to get the crews to the moon and back, all mission operations from Earth, and they will even provide science experiments to be performed on the lunar surface. Each flight is planned to consist of a two person crew, staying for up to two days on the moon, and is estimated to cost $1.4 billion.

That price tag will put these flights out of the reach of most people, however governments from other countries, who have science objectives they wish to pursue on the Moon, could certainly start the ball rolling. Then, as with all things, the costs of these flights would come down in time, making it possible for more individuals to go on these trips.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/geekquinox/golden-spike-company-fly-moon-1-4-billion-170501495.html
 
Back
Top