axlsalinger
Well-known member
Habsy Don't Surf.
OT: American Politics
- Thread starter MindzEye
- Start date
Habsy Don't Surf.
BKerr
Banned
We clearly have different definitions of successful war.
I think that the US will ultimately win the war, but will also suffer heavy, heavy losses in the process. I wouldn't call that a success, you would.
zeke
Well-known member
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/i...=topNews&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social
this is actually a really big real deal.
this is actually a really big real deal.
Altair
Well-known member
Big picture mate.
BKerr
Banned
Big Picture is not losing hundreds of thousands of lives, and weakening yourself allowing the Russians to have even more influence in geopolitics.
Habsy
Not playing around anymore.
It's complete conjecture.
Altair
Well-known member
Something like the Falkland is what I expect and I would call that a unqualified success. China stepping back, countries around the region seeing that China can run wild without consequences or pushback, and a independent Taiwan.
First Iraq war is a success to me as well.
In a perfect world we wouldn't need police, soldiers, hell, we wouldn't need fire fighters.
It's not a perfect world.
Last edited:
zeke
Well-known member
wat
BKerr
Banned
Yes, but no one is surprised by it. We all strongly suspected this before the election, at least those of us paying attention did.
And like I said, the biggest beneficiary of a China-U.S. war? Russia.
Funny how Trump is taking a hardline with China but no one thats so soft, it might as well be no line at all with Russia.
Altair
Well-known member
If Europe(and canada) actually spent the money they promised to pay for their own defense they wouldn't need the assistance of the USA.
Funny that.
One reason I'm sure trump is so pro Taiwan is that they actually care about their own defense. 2.4 percent of GDP, and they aren't even a country.
corksens
Legend
Could you post the report? I legit just want to see the it/the highlights.
Was it much different than other countries, like the Sauds, funding Clinton's election?
Habsy
Not playing around anymore.
It's conjecture. Look up the meaning. They're concluding without definitive proof of motive. Furthermore, I can guarantee you the anonymous sources are Democrats. There is no definitive proof, if there was there would be far more fallout, challenges and quite probably a reelection.
Conjecture.
Habsy
Not playing around anymore.
It's the "to get Trump elected" that's absolutely pure conjecture and truthfully, garbage spewed by Democrats that can't take blame for their own shortcomings.