zeke
Well-known member
If you want to define 6% as big, knock yerself out.
I don't have to define it as anything.
I showed you the exact impact.
If you want to define 6% as big, knock yerself out.
Rielly got destroyed by the middle and grit shits for some reason.
You showed me a normalization of dfenwick%.I don't have to define it as anything.
I showed you the exact impact.
Ceci was actually pretty good defensively. It was in the offensive zone that he looked like a plumber.
IMO the real interesting part of that is the success level vs. elite, medium and grit rather than the TOI% breakdown.
So vs Elite
Rielly: 37.2 TOI%, 51.2 CF%, 3.40 CF rel, 8.08 CF/60 rel, 0.36 CA/60 rel
Muzzin: 34.8 TOI%, 48.10 CF%, -11.19 CF/60 rel, -2.47 CA/60 rel
Dermott: 25.2 TOI%, 52.00 CF%, -0.41 CF/60 rel, -6.61 CA/60 rel
Holl 35.9 TOI%, 46.4 CF%, -10.91 CF/60 rel, 0.41 CA/60 rel
Barrie 24.2 TOI%, 50.2 CF%, 5.54 CF/60 rel, 3.80 CA/60 rel
Ceci 34.8 TOI%, 50.9 CF%, 1.65 CF/60 rel, -3,01 CA/60 rel
I wish they had xG,but Rielly is only slightly below average in shot suppression vs elite comp.
Also keep Dermott at all costs.
And Ceci > Holl. Holl kinda sucks in a shutdown role.
You showed me a normalization of dfenwick%.
Usage is measured by toi.yes. aka the exact impact of that so-called "minor" difference in usage.
Usage is measured by toi.
their dff% (difficult fenwick) is their version of expected goals, btw.
Rielly does not have super-elite usage.
What's the calculation?correct. and a very simple calculation normalizes those differences in toi.
Rielly does not have super-elite usage.
Rielly was 23rd in dmen TOI% vs elite comp this year.
Rielly was 23rd in dmen TOI% vs elite comp this year.