• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

2025-2026 Off Season Thread - The Rehappening

Agreed but the other teams do better on the other 92% of the cap

Other teams failures are mainly asset management stupidity not the tax difference

Seriously. Do you not understand how stupid your take on this is?

You're working under this weird assertion that other teams being beat by this are failing because they make bad decisions....when if they are making decisions of the same fucking quality as a non tax team, they lose by 8-9% by structure.

The whole point of this fucking system is to take away systemic financial advantage. The entire fucking point.
 
Yeah, I mean what's the point of the cap anyway if it doesn't apply in the playoffs?

well the cap was always only about keeping player salaries at a percentage of league revenue, not about enforcing competitiveness, so that's not really the issue.

it just seems to me that it would create a weird situation where some teams could literally double their payroll at the deadline (while only actually paying a fraction of the actual increase)......but i could be wrong.
 
Seriously. Do you not understand how stupid your take on this is?

You're working under this weird assertion that other teams being beat by this are failing because they make bad decisions....when if they are making decisions of the same fucking quality as a non tax team, they lose by 8-9% by structure.

The whole point of this fucking system is to take away systemic financial advantage. The entire fucking point.
Your going way way way fucken overboard on this one

These teams had the advantage for decades nobody wanted to play for them , they have created a winning culture now

Some contracts are hardly any bargains , BOBO 10 mil , Sergashev 8.5 etc... if you factor in the tax issue

These are examples of total fiscal disadvantage

Dodgers and Mets 300 fucken mil and 75 % of the league cant touch them for players in free agency

Soto makes more than some franchises this year

GSW spend 400-500 mil on payroll winning titles and most teams cant afford 200-300 on luxury bills

Your crying over 8-9% that mainly affects your core 4-5 players , 8 mil in Florida vs 9.3 elsewhere etc..

Seriously are your Leafs playoff fuck ups because of the 8-9% or the moronic trade deadline deals , bloated contracts , terrible drafting and piss poor asset management that waited too long to change the DNA .

Zito and Nill have done a great job drafting and developing and turning rejects and reclamation projects into solid players

The rest of the league has a smaller margin for error and needs to make much smarter decisions but they can all compete
 
Your crying over 8-9% that mainly affects your core 4-5 players , 8 mil in Florida vs 9.3 elsewhere etc..

Amazing that you can type all of that while actually grasping this point.

Amazing.

But no, it definitely effects more than your core players. It effects literally every contract on your roster. Everyone will sign for 8-9% less because they don't care about AAV on puckpedia, they care about take home paycheque.

At a 95 million dollar cap, it's likely operating with a 103-104 million dollar cap.
 
Gary still actively trying to level the playing field, other than the actual take home pay issue which is a far larger imbalance than bonuses. But, as this was a bonus that benefitted Canadian teams most (the whole CRA case with Tavares was about bonus money being tax free for a non Canadian tax resident coming to Canada to work)...well, we can all fuck off and like it.

Teams in no state tax jurisdictions though can continue enjoying their annual 8-9% boost in AAV efficiency when constructing their rosters though.
just a quick point of clarification - there was a hockey news article posted here earlier about Tavares' appeal in Tax Court - that article was factually just full of a lot of shit. the matter is not resolved and remains ongoing. just want to set the record straight there.
 
Amazing that you can type all of that while actually grasping this point.

Amazing.

But no, it definitely effects more than your core players. It effects literally every contract on your roster. Everyone will sign for 8-9% less because they don't care about AAV on puckpedia, they care about take home paycheque.

At a 95 million dollar cap, it's likely operating with a 103-104 million dollar cap.
Very basic mathematics here, I'm surprised some folks can't grasp it.
 
GSW spend 400-500 mil on payroll winning titles and most teams cant afford 200-300 on luxury bills.
Yeah, you know that the NBA just made major changes to their second appron luxury tax penalties to address your exact point? That is why Boston had their mini "teardown". And I expect more moves like that throughout the league.
 
That’s one to stay the fuck away from. I’d rather give a crazy overpay to kane on a one year deal then touch ehlers.
Ehlers and Boesser are traps

Good enough to get very long term deals, but probably look like way better options than they are cause of a shit class.

IMO its Marner, Bennett and Ekblad at the top, these two frauds and alot of olds that could/should be good short term value
 
while true, this begs the question as to why they care about things like signing bonus allocations, term limits, salary variation, etc.
Signing bonus would be lockout proof, term limits and salary variation due to the retirement contracts handed out where the last several years it is expected the player doesnt play. Both would have impacts on overall dollars spent in a playing time frame.
 
Back
Top