So i dont think you can view Hildeby as part of the Paul move? Like yes he was in the trade but he was forced out by choosing Bob and had limited value.The Ru Paul move might be good, if he both bounces back and the 6'7 viking goalie isn't actually good, which he might be.
Paul had 15 points in 57 games this year (22 point pace). Jenner had 38 in 67 (47 point pace).And someone needed to play the heavies instead of Matthews, and fuck me the UFA market was thin.
Paul on the market would have got Jenner money i think.
His two years previous were really good, and he was hurt.Paul had 15 points in 57 games this year (22 point pace). Jenner had 38 in 67 (47 point pace).
I think he'd get paid pretty well because he was decent a couple years ago, but Jenner money is a bit aggressive for a guy that barely an NHL player this year.
Expecting 4 years 6 million for a guy that had 15 points the prior year is a wild take. You're getting bamboozled by the brand name of Jake Paul. Settle down.His two years previous were really good, and he was hurt.
I suspect he'd get the benefit of the doubt.
so much cope going on here.
Terrible day.
So i dont think you can view Hildeby as part of the Paul move? Like yes he was in the trade but he was forced out by choosing Bob and had limited value.
I reject the notion that Paul just had one random bad year. He's been trending down for years now.
View attachment 35343
View: https://x.com/mapleleafs/status/2072456184733249814?s=46
He mentioned Mats and Hardy but not Metcalf.
I think the D is good, but I also think he's still trying to make moves.Not really seeing the improvement from last year besides the obvious Raddysh and McKenna. Not nearly good enough imo. Besides Raddysh our defense isnt changed much.
McCabe - Raddysh
Rielly - Tanev
Andrae? - OEL
Tanev is still doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Really hoping the wheels haven’t fallen off Rielly. OEL old.
A bunch of moves made today that seem more to be about change for the sake of change and less about being way better than they were last year.
View: https://x.com/leafslatest/status/2072493931145658513?s=46
So they didn’t structure it in a way to avoid being a 35+ contract.