.
The various referee support systems (review, VAR, Hawkeye, whatever) have been around long enough to pass judgement IMO, and across the board they've made the overall level of officiating worse, not better.
I don’t believe this to be true….I think a significant enough number of offsides, and penalties given/taken away have been corrected that otherwise wouldn’t have been to make it much more accurately called overall.
now has that accuracy taken away from the thrill & excitement of the game? (waiting to see if a VAR call takes back a goal, sucks some of the life out of the moment, unquestionably).
We all assumed that if the refs could just get some help in crucial situations, that would make outcomes more fair and their jobs easier ... wrong, wrong, wrong. It made refs more timid to make calls in real time and there's not a single sport that has enough competent people working the reviews to support the process.
I definitely haven’t come away from the VAR era thinking too
few plays are called…..and if anything I feel like the VAR officials can too often be timid to call the ref over to the screen.
that said, I’m fine with it….I want fewer calls overall, not more. (I’d like waaaaay fewer goals taken back from close offsides plays, especially)
MAYBE tennis has gotten a bit better with automation, otherwise it's all been either no better or worse.
Every sport has gotten “better” in terms of the accuracy of their calls, from replays…..but whether it’s enough of a value to trump what it takes away from the spontaneous energy of the game, is to be determined.
MLB had handled replays remarkably well, and usually do them with a speed & accuracy to have been a great addition. (Overall I think VAR has too, especially when taking into account those done during play, to ensure an uncalled foul should actually have been called.)
Doesn’t mean they still don’t get them wrong, they all do…..but the success rate on replay usage correcting or confirming a call, is remarkably high across sport.