• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Domi + 3rd pick for Anderson

Was Anderson injured the entire year for him to have 1G in 26 games? Maybe that will help understand this.
 
But if so then why the third rounder? That's all but admitting you think Anderson > Domi.
im not a fan of the third rounder myself

a lot of factors could be at play

domi wanting too much money for what he brings

but likely size = value
 
I would rather not have given up the 3rd as well, but I don't mind this deal. Anderson is a big body RH shot that could be a Tom Wilson. There are not many players like him. Arguably this is why the premium was paid. I get that Domi was a technically a centre, but he was a flawed centre.

Our RH wing depth before this was: Gallagher, Armia, Weal. This move balances the top 2 lines
Tatar-Danault-Gallagher
Drouin-Suzuki-Anderson

This doesn't even include a possible upgrade by dealing the 1st overall pick.
first we will have to acquire that pick :p
 
I would rather not have given up the 3rd as well, but I don't mind this deal. Anderson is a big body RH shot that could be a Tom Wilson. There are not many players like him. Arguably this is why the premium was paid. I get that Domi was a technically a centre, but he was a flawed centre.

Our RH wing depth before this was: Gallagher, Armia, Weal. This move balances the top 2 lines
Tatar-Danault-Gallagher
Drouin-Suzuki-Anderson

This doesn't even include a possible upgrade by dealing the 1st overall pick.

Dano will not be a top 2C
 
forgive my ignorance, but is there actual evidence of Anderson a) holding down a top-6 role with CBJ, and b) succeeding in that role?

pretty sure this guy has been a healthy scratch recently, and a mainstay in the bottom six last year.
no
 
I'd rather not have full value on a deal that fills a need than getting a lot of value of a deal that fills no need.
 
Back
Top