• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

I mean, 30 years or 50 years, does it really matter?

What's the point when rates are so high anyway, like a 6% or 7% mortgage is so damn enticing I want to lock it in for a half century?
 

'South Park’ Creators Say Show Attacks Trump Because Politics Are ‘Pop Culture’ and ‘There’s No Getting Away’ From MAGA, New Paramount Bosses Are ‘Letting Us Do Whatever We Want’​

 
I mean, 30 years or 50 years, does it really matter?

Yes, immensely.

500K initial mortgage at 5% for 25 years = 876K fully paid
500K initial mortgage at 5% for 30 years = 966K fully paid
500K initial mortgage at 5% for 50 years = 1.36M fully paid

Instead of providing affordable housing, it's allowing your housing market to become a mechanism of producing debt slaves to the bank.
 
I mean, 30 years or 50 years, does it really matter?

Yes. 20 years is gigantic…. massive, obviously. See: compounding. See: opportunity cost (of not benefiting from compounding on the investment side). See: multigenerational mortgages.

They are putting the middle class in the a debt cycle vice for their entire working lives, which will stretch well into their 70s.

This is truly brutal. Oligarchs, in this case the princelings of finance, are literally leeching more wealth out of the middle class and hindering their capacity to save and invest for themselves.
 
Last edited:
Yes, immensely.

500K initial mortgage at 5% for 25 years = 876K fully paid
500K initial mortgage at 5% for 30 years = 966K fully paid
500K initial mortgage at 5% for 50 years = 1.36M fully paid

Instead of providing affordable housing, it's allowing your housing market to become a mechanism of producing debt slaves to the bank.

Um.

This?

lol

The opportunity cost of reducing middle class savings/investment will be devastating.

Also note that those interest payments live on income statements, not balance sheets. All that additional cash flow is going to current expenses, not asset accumulation.
 
Last edited:
Yes, immensely.

500K initial mortgage at 5% for 25 years = 876K fully paid
500K initial mortgage at 5% for 30 years = 966K fully paid
500K initial mortgage at 5% for 50 years = 1.36M fully paid

Instead of providing affordable housing, it's allowing your housing market to become a mechanism of producing debt slaves to the bank.
Yes, I know the longer a mortgage runs, the more you pay.

My point was that pretty much no one stays in the same home for 30 years anyway, and along the way they refi every time the rates improve over what they have, usually resetting the 30 year clock. Nobody is forcing anyone to stay in their home, they can sell at any time, any many times circumstances forces a sale early (death, loss of job, etc.). So it will almost never get to the 30 years, not to mention 50 years.

And I don't see how it's a selling point for anyone in this climate anyway. I don't want a 1 year mortgage at the current rate.
 
Yes. 20 years is gigantic…. massive, obviously. See: compounding. See: opportunity cost (of not benefiting from compounding on the investment side). See: multigenerational mortgages.

They are putting the middle class in the a debt cycle vice for their entire working lives, which will stretch well into their 70s.

This is truly brutal. Oligarchs, in this case the princelings of finance, are literally leeching more wealth out of the middle class and hindering their capacity to save and invest for themselves.
But you don't have to select the longest term. While there are 30 years here, there are also 5, 10, 15 too.

I think what they're offering is a nothingburger that adds zero to what is already there. I don't see how letting someone have a rate for 50 years instead of taking the 30 years if they wanted would make anything worse when it's all optional.
 
But you don't have to select the longest term. While there are 30 years here, there are also 5, 10, 15 too.

I think what they're offering is a nothingburger that adds zero to what is already there. I don't see how letting someone have a rate for 50 years instead of taking the 30 years if they wanted would make anything worse when it's all optional.

The 08 collapse , at least on the consumer side of the equation, was set off by entirely optional (and bad) mortgage choices. I wouldn't underestimate the ability of bad consumer choices to put the broader economy at structural risk, especially when the wall street guys are amplifying the impact of every dollar lost with their usual financialized fuckery.
 
Back
Top