Still boggles my mind that 60+ million people went into a voting booth and decided, yeah, I'll vote for this buffoon to be the president of the United States and leader of the free world.
#MakeAmericaSmartAgain
Yep. I remember thinking this during the Bush years. Electing him once? Whatever, people get caught up in the rhetoric and vote for whoever. But getting re-elected? That's buying into the buffoonery.
But man, I didn't think there was anyone out there who could make us look back fondly at the Bush years...
Yep. I remember thinking this during the Bush years. Electing him once? Whatever, people get caught up in the rhetoric and vote for whoever. But getting re-elected? That's buying into the buffoonery.
But man, I didn't think there was anyone out there who could make us look back fondly at the Bush years...
Your heads will explode when Agent Orange wins another term. It’s actually better for the Dems if they lose the house again this year and allow the feckless gop to spin wheels another 2 years. It will take away Trumps excuse that it was the Democrats in the house that prevented his awesomeness at like presidenting and stuff.
Your heads will explode when Agent Orange wins another term. It’s actually better for the Dems if they lose the house again this year and allow the feckless gop to spin wheels another 2 years. It will take away Trumps excuse that it was the Democrats in the house that prevented his awesomeness at like presidenting and stuff.
America just gets tossed into the pile of countries that no one gives a shit about when bad things happen to it.
Car bomb in Iraq. Meh.
Suicide bombing in Afghanistan. Must be Monday.
Starving African kids starve? Uh huh.
Mass shooting in America. **** em.
better for the dems maybe but not the USA
and either way trump will just make up some excuse that will be gobbled up
ie: he will blame the dems either way
Trump isn't winning a second term. His approval is as high as it is almost solely because he's sitting on top of (and blatantly taking credit for) a strong economy that he inherited. His tax cuts are quickly losing popularity and "librul tears" only makes about 30% of the country erect. The rest look around and see that things are good economically, so shrug their shoulders and assume that he must be doing a good job.
The economy is a slow moving beast and trends can change, but the trends are absolutely moving in the wrong direction
Exhibit A: The yield spread between 10 & 2 yr government bonds.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y
The yield spread does a pretty ****ing tremendous job of predicting US recessions. Basically when there is no difference between the bond yield of a 10 yr and 2 yr bond, the US economy slows the **** down (sometimes in spectacular fashion). That seriously appears to be coming.
Exhibit B: Tightening of the money supply (rising interest rates)
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/interest-rate
The financial crisis in 08 put the weight of the world on Obama and the US Fed and both did a pretty decent job of playing their part to more or less rescue the economy. Obama had TARP, but the larger part of why the US turned around relatively quickly (and there wasn't a 30's style decade of economic depression) is that the Fed basically made borrowing money free. The US economy went through rounds of Quantitative Easing (aka, pouring buckets of money down the economy's throat) at ridiculously low interest rates. Well, QE stopped a couple of years ago, but the interest rates remained at a pretty historic low until recently when the fed has started to ratchet the rate back up into the 2% range (which is still historically low). This tightening of the money supply will lead to slightly slower growth but more importantly, it removes the biggest tool in the Fed's bag to combat a bad economy should a Trump recession be a harsh one. In normal circumstances, the Fed can make a pretty significant impact by
Exhibit C: Trade Wars
This just ****ing exacerbates everything else. One of the key reasons for these long term trade deals like Nafta is that it creates a relatively fair, but almost entirely stable long term set of rules that allows companies to invest money in future production with the confidence that they will see the fruits of their investment in the future. That spending of profits on expansion is the mortar of any economy. It generates short term, usually high paying construction jobs and then longer term employment, often in areas that need it (look at the expansion of automotive production in the US south for a good example of this). Fewer new jobs means less consumer spending, which means the service/retail sectors starts to suffer almost immediately. To make matters even worse, the prices of just about everything goes up because of tariffs and large chunks of your economy are basically landlocked so the already relatively small domestic consumer base you have the ability to sell to, is getting smaller and poorer by the day.
Exhibit D: Stock Market
The stock market is not the economy. Something in the range of 15% of all Americans even own a publicly traded equity, so it really and truly is only a measure of the wealth for the wealthy. It is however a pretty ****ing decent barometer for the sentiment of big/smart money within the economy. It is prone to over reacting in both directions to current economic sentiment but again, it does a good job of letting us know what big/smart money thinks is going to happen in the future. Well, the DOW is down 2000 points since January.
So yeah, unless if all of this shit turns around, Trump isn't winning shit. He's almost historically unpopular at this point in his presidency with an economy that is slowly turning against him.
Trump isn't winning a second term. His approval is as high as it is almost solely because he's sitting on top of (and blatantly taking credit for) a strong economy that he inherited. His tax cuts are quickly losing popularity and "librul tears" only makes about 30% of the country erect. The rest look around and see that things are good economically, so shrug their shoulders and assume that he must be doing a good job.
The economy is a slow moving beast and trends can change, but the trends are absolutely moving in the wrong direction
Exhibit A: The yield spread between 10 & 2 yr government bonds.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y
The yield spread does a pretty ****ing tremendous job of predicting US recessions. Basically when there is no difference between the bond yield of a 10 yr and 2 yr bond, the US economy slows the **** down (sometimes in spectacular fashion). That seriously appears to be coming.
Exhibit B: Tightening of the money supply (rising interest rates)
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/interest-rate
The financial crisis in 08 put the weight of the world on Obama and the US Fed and both did a pretty decent job of playing their part to more or less rescue the economy. Obama had TARP, but the larger part of why the US turned around relatively quickly (and there wasn't a 30's style decade of economic depression) is that the Fed basically made borrowing money free. The US economy went through rounds of Quantitative Easing (aka, pouring buckets of money down the economy's throat) at ridiculously low interest rates. Well, QE stopped a couple of years ago, but the interest rates remained at a pretty historic low until recently when the fed has started to ratchet the rate back up into the 2% range (which is still historically low). This tightening of the money supply will lead to slightly slower growth but more importantly, it removes the biggest tool in the Fed's bag to combat a bad economy should a Trump recession be a harsh one. In normal circumstances, the Fed can make a pretty significant impact by
Exhibit C: Trade Wars
This just ****ing exacerbates everything else. One of the key reasons for these long term trade deals like Nafta is that it creates a relatively fair, but almost entirely stable long term set of rules that allows companies to invest money in future production with the confidence that they will see the fruits of their investment in the future. That spending of profits on expansion is the mortar of any economy. It generates short term, usually high paying construction jobs and then longer term employment, often in areas that need it (look at the expansion of automotive production in the US south for a good example of this). Fewer new jobs means less consumer spending, which means the service/retail sectors starts to suffer almost immediately. To make matters even worse, the prices of just about everything goes up because of tariffs and large chunks of your economy are basically landlocked so the already relatively small domestic consumer base you have the ability to sell to, is getting smaller and poorer by the day.
Exhibit D: Stock Market
The stock market is not the economy. Something in the range of 15% of all Americans even own a publicly traded equity, so it really and truly is only a measure of the wealth for the wealthy. It is however a pretty ****ing decent barometer for the sentiment of big/smart money within the economy. It is prone to over reacting in both directions to current economic sentiment but again, it does a good job of letting us know what big/smart money thinks is going to happen in the future. Well, the DOW is down 2000 points since January.
So yeah, unless if all of this shit turns around, Trump isn't winning shit. He's almost historically unpopular at this point in his presidency with an economy that is slowly turning against him.
I think he can be defeated if the GOP keeps control. I think he has a better shot at repeating if he can obfuscate using the Dems as scape goats.
poor Jim Jordan.
![]()
While I appreciate you taking the time to produce this post I have to disagree with your conclusion. Trump is far more popular than you think and his silent supporters are still lurking. Sure a crappy economy would likely end him but as you said, it’s a slow moving beast.
To my point, should the Dems win the house, he will blame them for everything and anything and people will believe him. Bet on that. The question is will enough people believe him to win.
Right now I’m leaning yes, enough will. A lot can change in two years though.
While I appreciate you taking the time to produce this post I have to disagree with your conclusion. Trump is far more popular than you think and his silent supporters are still lurking. Sure a crappy economy would likely end him but as you said, it’s a slow moving beast.
To my point, should the Dems win the house, he will blame them for everything and anything and people will believe him. Bet on that. The question is will enough people believe him to win.
Right now I’m leaning yes, enough will. A lot can change in two years though.
Yeah, I'm not expecting the average voter to factor in yield spreads when making their voting decisions.
It will come down to whether the Dems can run a reasonable option who can successfully counter Trump's popularity.
And also we need to keep in mind - just because Trump is causing the Democrats popularity in places like NY to be at around 103% with the margin of error, that doesn't mean a worker in Ohio or Wisconsin is going to vote Dem. What might hurt him most is the fact that the trade war with Canada is going to hit some of those norther border states that he so desperately needs. If Ohio and Pennsylvania get hammered due to the tariffs, and whoever is running against Trump can convince the people there that it was Trump who did that and not those evil socialists in Canada, then he'd DOA.