GrandWazoo
Well-known member
What??
HmmmIt will... that's too obvious.
With the puck on his stick... no interference100% initiated by Stankoven all on his own.
Stankoven was batting at the puck
Doesn't matter... intentional or not, he ran into the goalie. Not saying it should have been a penalty but that goal should not have counted.Stankoven was batting at the puck
Doesn't matter... intentional or not, he ran into the goalie. Not saying it should have been a penalty but that goal should not have counted.With the puck on his stick... no interference
Wasn’t conclusive enough. If they kill this pp they need to get mad and get after it.yeah...he's got a right to do so....I thought they might get Taylor Hall for slamming at Dobes' pads
That’s a 50/50 at best man. It really could be called either way because nobody knows what goalie interference is anymore.Doesn't matter... intentional or not, he ran into the goalie. Not saying it should have been a penalty but that goal should not have counted.
heck...some moments it seems they are on the PP when we are on the PPStill worth a challenge IMO...Canes are basically on a power play when we're 5 on 5, so what's the difference?
Run Anderson.With the puck on his stick... no interference
yeah...he's got a right to do so....I thought they might get Taylor Hall for slamming at Dobes' pads
Was enough to rule it incidental.. he didn't push him into net or continue contact after thatDoesn't matter... intentional or not, he ran into the goalie. Not saying it should have been a penalty but that goal should not have counted.
heck...some moments it seems they are on the PP when we are on the PP
i'm so pissed off at Cole right now.....completely invisible....at least Suzy made a few plays so far....Slaf made a nice pass in front of net.....That’s a 50/50 at best man. It really could be called either way because nobody knows what goalie interference is anymore.
Habs should be crashing the net hard.
shots are 12-3
LOL