MyNameIsJonas
Well-known member
Congratulations all
Thought Raddysh would get 9M+ so not bad and addresses a big need. I wonder if we trade Rielly for a forward now
View: https://x.com/i/status/2067949856891564292
About 1m higher than I would have preferred but it's just 1m. I'll survive.
Lacks the flow to have nonsweaty hairHome town boy forces trade to high tax, high pressure market.
A $12.4 million valuation is too high. The model recognizes the massive leap and assigns a pretty steep penalty, dropping Raddysh’s projected value from plus-11.3 to plus-9.4. Given his per-82 pace of plus-18.8 last year, the model is literally cutting that value in half, expecting Raddysh to fall back to earth in some capacity (as expected from a defenseman who quadrupled his goal output in one season). Even with that, a plus-9.4 defenseman is still very good and Raddysh is expected to maintain a high level in his 30s. Too high, but if you knew you were getting a No. 1 defenseman, $12.4 million is going to become the going rate.
A $4.8 million valuation is too low. New data is the most meaningful and that means shifting priors. Even if Raddysh regresses, it’s difficult to imagine he sinks right back into No. 4 territory after a season that good. All the underlying stuff from last year suggests he has above-average talent with the puck and, even before last season, he was consistently tilting the ice in the right direction for Tampa Bay with a high relative xG rate.
That puts us in the Goldilocks zone right in the middle of $8.6 million, which is roughly in line with what AFP Analytics is projecting at $8 million. At that price, the expectation is a top-pair defender and even if Raddysh drops off heavily from last year’s mark, that feels doable for him.
Ding Ding Ding....get this man a cigar