ME advocating for long-term deals to non-elite 30 year olds is not something I ever expected, I have to admit. Not saying he's wrong tho. Happy to aim sky high, but they probably need to accept some level of mediocrity in their acquisitions.
I'd push hard to get rid of Stolarz. I think Woll will end up being the more durable of them, and is younger.yup.
and if a team prefers Woll OEL and Robertson, well maybe, depending.
I also think ME is more realistic as to the Leafs chances for making trades.
Sound like ME too
It's purely situational. We have two cranky superstars who are considering not being here going forward. Which isn't to say that they're on the edge of demanding out now, but another season of anything but being back near the top of the table probably pushes at least Matthews over the edge into demanding a trade. At the same time we've been gifted a franchise prospect on his ELC for the next few years, probably returning the massive surplus cap value we haven't had from a player in like 5-6 years and we didn't capitalize on the first time around. While I would love to have the patience to wait until everything is perfect to take a swing at the perfect players, I would rather just use the cap space we have right now to add very good players in spots we badly need them. These aren't even mediocre players, they're really good players who all happen to play the positions and roles we have the highest need in right now. They're just not elite players.
The kicker is, that doing it my way gives us a better opportunity to land said elite player should they come available later. Even if we signed Raddysh and Andersson, there's no reason we couldn't trade for Werenski if he asked out of Columbus mid season.
We just ditched the worst GM (and hopefully coach) ever, just added a generational prospect, and have tons of capspace for the first time ever - let's instantly spend all that money on middlings and confine ourselves to caphell with no ability to add any more elites for another decade... AGAIN!
Sound like ME too
Recent trade for arguably the best Dman in the world, Q.Hughes:
C M.Rossi (24, #9. 5'9" 182): 2yr: 132gms, 17:57, 22gl/59pt pace
D Z.Buium (20, #12, 6'0" 183): 2yr: 76gms, 19:35, 7gl/28pt pace
W L.Ohgren (22, #19, 6'0" 187): 2yr: 93gms, 12:38, 9gl/20pt pace
+ Late 1st
Caphell, like biblical hell, is a place made up by weirdos to explain things they don't understand.
You seem to severely underestimate the risk of Matthews and Willy not liking what they see this season if we disappoint again, and ask out before one of our preferred unicorn defenders ever hits the market to be traded for. The "middlings" you mention were ranked, by Doms metric you were kind enough to send me last night, 11th and 32nd among all defenders and Coyle 22nd among all centres. That's not middling...those are very good players.
and again....Knies is the starting price for one of these unicorn defenders, cap space to fit said unicorn in is not an issue.
It is worth remembering that one of the main things both Willy & Auston brought up in their exit interviews was improving the defense. And specifically adding more puck-moving defense.
So if you roll back into training camp in the fall with the same top-7 D because you're keeping your powder dry for the foreseeable future waiting for a Unicorn, legit #1 defenseman to fall into your lap...that definitely seems like playing with fire.
I'd also like to state that, under almost no circumstance do I want this team to trade Matthew Knies. For me, he is now a core piece.
The only circumstance in which I ever consider it is for a legit, stud #1 defenseman who's still in his 20's and who is locked up for at least 3-4 more seasons. And, aside from Adam Fox on the Rangers, that player essentially does not exist.
And if it's someone who's more like a Quinn Hughes, where he's being traded because his team is rebuilding, his contract is expiring and he's made it clear he's not going to re-sign---players in those circumstances never get a roster player as good as Knies traded for them. It's always a collection of lesser and future assets, and I have no interest in seeing us being the ones bucking that trend