• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

msun30 said:
so contradictory.

the democrats support reforming electoral funding laws so as to decrease outsider influence over politics............
Click to expand...

You can stop right there because the rest is irrelevant.

The Democrats get ENORMOUS funding from unions on all levels and they see nothing wrong with it. It influences their decisions in every way on all levels. Amazingly, they don't want Constitutional amendments to ban "organizations" which is the banner unions fly under.

Unions will spend $400 million on just helping to re-elect the community organizer. I guess unions buying and influencing politicians is good and righteous and pretty. I get it.
 
Last edited:
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

Wow, what that eclectic collection of.........baby diaper content.

I'm going to celebrate May 1st by cutting everybody's wages by 10%, firing two people and importing more from China. :smilewinkgrin:
 
But that law impacting influence would limit union spending as well. So again, why oppose it? Like the rest of the post you said you couldn't be bothered to read past line 2 of pointed out, why not eliminate the influence? Unless you find union influence to be wrong but other corporate interests to be fine or so some other insane distinction. If democrats benefit from the system more or equally, why do they oppose it?
 
HabsAddict said:
You can stop right there because the rest is irrelevant.

The Democrats get ENORMOUS funding from unions on all levels and they see nothing wrong with it. It influences their decisions in every way on all levels. Amazingly, they don't want Constitutional amendments to ban "organizations" which is the banner unions fly under.

Unions will spend $400 million on just helping to re-elect the community organizer. I guess unions buying and influencing politicians is good and righteous and pretty. I get it.
Click to expand...

no, the rest isn't irrelevant. the rest of the post was the most relevant part.

instead you took my post out of context to go on a rant about unions.

well done.
 
WHO the Demon'crats want to limit is what this is all about.

Let me know when the Demno'crats want Constitutional amendments to ban unions from spending money on them.
 
One thing I will say about Bizarro World, is that its occupants are remarkably consistent.

As in consistently wrong, and clinging to a set of "facts" that are the mirror image of actual real facts, that appear in the real world.

.deyalp lleW
 
[video=youtube;ZlJG5mpsyvI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlJG5mpsyvI[/video]

**** the economy. more of this, please.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

JaysCyYoung said:
[video=youtube;0yDrtNEr_5M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yDrtNEr_5M[/video]
Click to expand...

best. anthem. ever. never knew what it said until that clip, but any time i heard it at a hockey game i'd get chills. fantastic anthem.

it still gives you a chubby, doesnt it jcy?
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

Bleedsblue&white said:
Four bucks a month, and you have to monitor your AC?

Wow. Hey man, if you need a few bucks, I can help you out.
Click to expand...
How long have you been dating Dalton for?

I can afford 4-6 bucks a month in an of itself. But when you add it to 6 years of price increases it's becoming unaffordable for the average family.

Ontarians pay top rates in North America. I think we're third overall.

But keep taking up the ass though.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

theREALkoreaboy said:
best. anthem. ever. never knew what it said until that clip, but any time i heard it at a hockey game i'd get chills. fantastic anthem.

it still gives you a chubby, doesnt it jcy?
Click to expand...

vladimir-putin-awesome-photos-29.jpg
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

corksens said:
Seriously you guys are such fvcking puppets.

In the summer it costs me 200+ per month in electricity w/ the AC on.

How can some people love getting butt raped so hard.
Click to expand...

buy one less watch and you can pay for it for the next x number of years.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

corksens said:
How long have you been dating Dalton for?

I can afford 4-6 bucks a month in an of itself. But when you add it to 6 years of price increases it's becoming unaffordable for the average family.

Ontarians pay top rates in North America. I think we're third overall.

But keep taking up the ass though.
Click to expand...

I don't give a **** about the political angle, you partisan moron...jesus christ, does every ****ing argument have to be filtered by who you cheer for?

Telling me you're going to cut back your AC because of the possibility of 6 more dollars on your bill is just stupid...and I called you on it.
And you have no idea who I would or would not vote for.
None.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

Bleedsblue&white said:
I don't give a **** about the political angle, you partisan moron...jesus christ, does every ****ing argument have to be filtered by who you cheer for?

Telling me you're going to cut back your AC because of the possibility of 6 more dollars on your bill is just stupid...and I called you on it.
And you have no idea who I would or would not vote for.
None.
Click to expand...
I can only assume you would vote for McGuinty. His cock is already half way up your ass and you're still asking for more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top