• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Leafs/Habs/Sens 2014-15

SENSible said:
Until they do, the Sens have the edge in nets.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Hammond's success might not be sustainable, and he certainly was outplayed by Price for most of the season, but it doesn't change the fact that he is currently playing as well as Price. All that matters is right now.
 
If I was betting my life on a game I would take Price every day of the week, but what Sensible is saying is technically right...Ottawa has a strong history of scoring against Price. For whatever reason they have his number.
 
corksens said:
If I was betting my life on a game I would take Price every day of the week, but what Sensible is saying is technically right...Ottawa has a strong history of scoring against Price. For whatever reason they have his number.
Click to expand...

I believe that's just sample size and is subject to progression to the mean.

Two years ago when we lost to you in the playoffs Price's regular season stats vs the Sens were 2-0-1 1.58 gaa .944 sv%. As you point out though, he wasn't good in the playoffs though.
 
Price has a career .919 sv% against the Sens

Not sure where the idea of the Sens having Price's "number" came from.
 
Wow, was Reed actually behind the bench for you this year?

That's real shitty. Bad run of luck for the Sens organization, between him and Bryan Murray. **** cancer.
 
corksens said:
If I was betting my life on a game I would take Price every day of the week, but what Sensible is saying is technically right...Ottawa has a strong history of scoring against Price.For whatever reason they have his number.
Click to expand...

Mindz was, I would assume, just refuting that claim, with y'know, facts.
 
LeafGm said:
Wow, was Reed actually behind the bench for you this year?

That's real shitty. Bad run of luck for the Sens organization, between him and Bryan Murray. **** cancer.
Click to expand...

I think I read that he was behind the bench until a month ago when the cancer returned.

**** cancer!
 
corksens said:
I suppose I should have been more clear in saying recent history.

Not sure why I have to do that, as most people around here know how irrelevant stats from 5 years ago are.
Click to expand...

You guys seem to think the playoffs from 2 years ago is relevant... but not Price's regular season dominance of the Sens from that same year.

Where's the cut off?

It's all moot though. When you break up an already small sample size you get useless information. Price has clearly had good and bad stretches vs the Sens and it appears to balance out to what his career norms are... chances are that none of it points towards any sort of trend though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top