• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

The official NFL thread

mbow30 said:
If you have the ball in your arms, are downed, and the defensive player rips it out of your arms after youre on the ground, that’s a catch
Click to expand...

If you made “football moves” before going to the ground
 
CH1 said:
It’s not a completed pass because the receiver’s possession did not survive falling to the ground and he hadn’t established possession prior
Click to expand...
Very similar play in the Bears game last night. The Bear/defender came away with the ball and they called it a completion and down by contact.

That's the frustrating thing about officiating/rules. So inconsistent.
 
Habspatrol said:
Very similar play in the Bears game last night. The Bear/defender came away with the ball and they called it a completion and down by contact.

That's the frustrating thing about officiating/rules. So inconsistent.
Click to expand...

In that case they ruled he made enough of a football move before he hit the ground

But ya, it’s very ambiguous at times, like goaltender interference… it comes down to how you interpret language
 
mbow30 said:
Dunno what that means. Guys roll into catches all the time.
Click to expand...
Bills got fucked by the officials yet again. Then they flagged the broncos to a TD after that.

That was not an interception, I’ve seen that called a catch many times.
 
Bringing Daboll back is a possibility. I’m not a Brady fan, some of his calls screwed McDermott. I like Daboll as OC.
 
We know earlier on that McDermott wanted more run calls and "complementary" play calling. I don't think we know what Brady's offence actually looks like.

If the Bills don't hire Brady, I think he gets hired somewhere else.
 
Wouldn’t be a loss imo. I’m just not a fan of his schemes. Can’t blame McDermott for the OC.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top