Yeah, well even Roman Reigns didn't pull that crap when he played football for Georgia Tech ... although he WAS a bit of a cheap shot artist.That looked like Ekblad was practicing a Roman Reigns Superman punch...Tampa will be all over the league this morning lobbying for a suspension...especially considering Hagel never returned and is probably concussed.
Mikkola's incident was even less of a hockey play than Ekblad's but yeah ... they both should sit and contemplate how much they value the safety of their fellow competitors.Both of those plays should be suspensions. But if I have to choose only 1, I think the Mikkola boarding incident deserves a suspension more than the Ekblad forearm shiver to the head.
Expecting the NHL to do something about player safety is like expecting the FA to do something about FFP.$5k for boarding a guy already down and vulnerable.
Brilliant league we got here.
I just had my eyes checked. Let me give you the address to my optometrist.To me it looked like Ekblad got Hagel in the shoulder and maybe the neck and it wasn’t that forceful (for hockey… if I were walking down the street and someone did that to me it’d be considered criminally forceful). Then Ekblad pushed Hagel down pretty forcefully and Hagel may have hit his head on the ice. The puck was there and a player is allowed to push another player off the puck. But everyone (except maybe the NHL) says it’s a no-doubt suspension. What am I not seeing? I’m not trying to be contrarian or disrespect Hagel. Some say the forearm was to the jaw. Ok, that would be contact to the head and hits to the jaw are an elevated concussion risk. That would be a suspendable offense for sure. That may have occurred but i didn't actually see that. What am I missing that everyone else is seeing?
Mikkola’s hit? Vulnerable position, direct to the head, completely avoidable. Textbook suspension.
I'm sure Sid will lobby for Tocchet. Never been impressed with him as a coach, so ... knock yourselves out.My money is on Tocchet going to Pittsburgh for that job.