Anderson would behead him. We got the better playerMax Domi is thinking about it.
Yes. But Price will have played 8 to 10 fewer RS games (in a normal season).
Nah, he would then have to fight his buddy Josh Anderson. Accidentally shooting the puck into the Habs bench and hitting Julien in the nose, he might consider.Max Domi is thinking about it.
Didn’t Gomez-Brodeur do that a few weeks before Julien got fired in NJNah, he would then have to fight his buddy Josh Anderson. Accidentally shooting the puck into the Habs bench and hitting Julien in the nose, he might consider.
Hahahaha. He has no levarage. Of course not.
I'm not mad. I fully expect this to happen. The same way I fully expected Petry would be re-signed and that Gallagher's going to get an anchor contract.
Different argument....we should be letting both Tatar and Gally go (in trades for assets).....will this organization ever stop losing assets for nothing. At least under Bergy we have been able to flip players for picks-prospects. That’s been his best quality as GM. But when he falls in love with players, it clouds his decision making (Price contract, and soon Gally)
Hahahaha. He has no levarage. Of course not.
I'm not mad. I fully expect this to happen. The same way I fully expected Petry would be re-signed and that Gallagher's going to get an anchor contract.
When healthy, he’s probably the second best “power forward” in the league. Tom Wilson is the best. The Jamie Benn’s of the league are too skilled to be referred to as just power forwards.
Seems the way the contract was structured is that he start at a lower AVG, then on year 2-4 gets a huge salary and then on the last 2 years of his deal, his salary goes down. Also, in NTC gets less restrictive as the years on his contracts goes forward. So I think Bergevin structured the deal to make it easier to trade him in his last 2 years in the event there is a drop in performances on his end.
Do you rank the Ktachuks as power forwards
Also after the next 3-years of flat cap, the cap will skyrocket...no way Seattle isn’t an absolute smash like Vegas bringing in big time revenue$Seems the way the contract was structured is that he start at a lower AVG, then on year 2-4 gets a huge salary and then on the last 2 years of his deal, his salary goes down. Also, in NTC gets less restrictive as the years on his contracts goes forward. So I think Bergevin structured the deal to make it easier to trade him in his last 2 years in the event there is a drop in performances on his end.
He’s the new Chris Kreider who we should have drafted long ago.this dude has a unique skill set, absolutely blows by defenders.
Speaking of Seattle, Habs are likely to lose a decent roster player.Also after the next 3-years of flat cap, the cap will skyrocket...no way Seattle isn’t an absolute smash like Vegas bringing in big time revenue$
Speaking of Seattle, Habs are likely to lose a decent roster player.