• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Josh Anderson signs 7 x $5.5m

Nah, he would then have to fight his buddy Josh Anderson. Accidentally shooting the puck into the Habs bench and hitting Julien in the nose, he might consider.
Didn’t Gomez-Brodeur do that a few weeks before Julien got fired in NJ
 
When healthy, he’s probably the second best “power forward” in the league. Tom Wilson is the best. The Jamie Benn’s of the league are too skilled to be referred to as just power forwards.
 
Last edited:
Hahahaha. He has no levarage. Of course not.

I'm not mad. I fully expect this to happen. The same way I fully expected Petry would be re-signed and that Gallagher's going to get an anchor contract.
Different argument....we should be letting both Tatar and Gally go (in trades for assets).....will this organization ever stop losing assets for nothing. At least under Bergy we have been able to flip players for picks-prospects. That’s been his best quality as GM. But when he falls in love with players, it clouds his decision making (Price contract, and soon Gally)

bingo
 
Hahahaha. He has no levarage. Of course not.

I'm not mad. I fully expect this to happen. The same way I fully expected Petry would be re-signed and that Gallagher's going to get an anchor contract.
When healthy, he’s probably the second best “power forward” in the league. Tom Wilson is the best. The Jamie Benn’s of the league are too skilled to be referred to as just power forwards.

Do you rank the Ktachuks as power forwards
 
Seems the way the contract was structured is that he start at a lower AVG, then on year 2-4 gets a huge salary and then on the last 2 years of his deal, his salary goes down. Also, in NTC gets less restrictive as the years on his contracts goes forward. So I think Bergevin structured the deal to make it easier to trade him in his last 2 years in the event there is a drop in performances on his end.
 
Seems the way the contract was structured is that he start at a lower AVG, then on year 2-4 gets a huge salary and then on the last 2 years of his deal, his salary goes down. Also, in NTC gets less restrictive as the years on his contracts goes forward. So I think Bergevin structured the deal to make it easier to trade him in his last 2 years in the event there is a drop in performances on his end.

We need to get 25 goals a year …..those sweet passes from Nick and PP time

He could have a monster year this year
 
Seems the way the contract was structured is that he start at a lower AVG, then on year 2-4 gets a huge salary and then on the last 2 years of his deal, his salary goes down. Also, in NTC gets less restrictive as the years on his contracts goes forward. So I think Bergevin structured the deal to make it easier to trade him in his last 2 years in the event there is a drop in performances on his end.
Also after the next 3-years of flat cap, the cap will skyrocket...no way Seattle isn’t an absolute smash like Vegas bringing in big time revenue$
 
Also after the next 3-years of flat cap, the cap will skyrocket...no way Seattle isn’t an absolute smash like Vegas bringing in big time revenue$
Speaking of Seattle, Habs are likely to lose a decent roster player.
 
Back
Top