• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

League and Rules Discussion

Yeah that's not true at all. You've gone over a bunch of weeks. On my phone so can't research it, but I mentioned it a few times before
 
Deckie007 said:
Yeah that's not true at all. You've gone over a bunch of weeks. On my phone so can't research it, but I mentioned it a few times before
Click to expand...

I just looked it up you tool. Period 9 i went over one game by acccident and this week I didnt go over.
 
hairnova said:
According to Fantrax, you've gone over for one position or another in Weeks 6, 7, 9 and 10.
Click to expand...
Yep.

6 - 2 over on goalies
7 - 2 games over W
9 - 1 game goalies
10 - 1 game F

Don't know why Cheech is being so bitchy about it, he sets his lineup, not me.
 
Reading back I can see where Cheech felt this issue was settled.

Maybe we should just make a decision and go with it. Should we make it simple and just go with 12 forwards? We're already handcuffed to a degree by the cap.
 
Habspatrol said:
Reading back I can see where Cheech felt this issue was settled.

Maybe we should just make a decision and go with it. Should we make it simple and just go with 12 forwards? We're already handcuffed to a degree by the cap.
Click to expand...
I don't care either way. There's already enough built in flexibility on the roster that I doubt anyone felt the need to draft more wingers or centres based on position eligibility. I know I didn't.
 
Yeah that's the thing. Having 4, 4 and 4 already gives you enough flexibility... for how much easier it makes policing game limits it's worth it imo.


Should we put this to a vote? Or just impose it?
 
Sorry if I'm being a pain, but again I ask, how are we going to make the change?

Not saying I'm against anything, just asking... because as soon as we start changing settings, it goes retroactive to the start of the season.
 
If it's going to be retroactive, we should probably just wait until the off-season, as much as a pain this seems to be to police.
 
hairnova said:
Sorry if I'm being a pain, but again I ask, how are we going to make the change?

Not saying I'm against anything, just asking... because as soon as we start changing settings, it goes retroactive to the start of the season.
Click to expand...

What would happen though? You figure that points will be added for team that had gone over?
 
Let's say if someone had used 19C and someone else played by the rules and only used the allotted 16, that wouldn't really be fair.

I just don't think we should change the rules and then have scores change from previous weeks (unless we want to record the matchups to this point and manually change them).

Personally, I have a spreadsheet made up and I keep track of my GP so I never go over. With a change, that might screw me if I'm playing someone who didn't pay as close attention.
 
Dammit... I tried setting it to 12 F positions but it retroactively gave everyone illegal rosters for having players set at C and W.
 
hairnova said:
Let's say if someone had used 19C and someone else played by the rules and only used the allotted 16, that wouldn't really be fair.

I just don't think we should change the rules and then have scores change from previous weeks (unless we want to record the matchups to this point and manually change them).

Personally, I have a spreadsheet made up and I keep track of my GP so I never go over. With a change, that might screw me if I'm playing someone who didn't pay as close attention.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah... I would never have made a change that would have changed anyone's record.
 
I set it back to what we had.

Guess we should leave it as is and just do as we discussed last week. 48 game maximum for all forwards combined.
 
For what it is worth, I'm firmly behind the 48 game maximum for all forwards. It seems to be a hot button issue, but the micromanagement side of things turns me off completely. I was also 100% under the impression that we went that way as of last week. I can understand why Cheech came to the same conclusion.

Not to mention, I liked the harmony that we had early on. It seems like there is a ton of frustration with something that we can fix quickly and it ultimately has very little impact on things overall. To me, we're splitting hairs on the topic. But, I can understand both sides.
 
Tully78 said:
For what it is worth, I'm firmly behind the 48 game maximum for all forwards. It seems to be a hot button issue, but the micromanagement side of things turns me off completely. I was also 100% under the impression that we went that way as of last week. I can understand why Cheech came to the same conclusion.

Not to mention, I liked the harmony that we had early on. It seems like there is a ton of frustration with something that we can fix quickly and it ultimately has very little impact on things overall. To me, we're splitting hairs on the topic. But, I can understand both sides.
Click to expand...

Yeah you're right... it definitely seemed like it could have been a final decision. That's why I ended up giving Cheech his 5 points back.

We'll say that going forward it's 48 forward games.

I'll ask that people try to balance it out so their lineups don't appear to be illegal... if it happens we'll deal with it.
 
Just so everyone is aware... I added a 6th bench spot to make it easier to bench players if need be. This isn't meant to carry an extra player.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top