real definition of backing in, Sweden went 0-2-4 in world cup qualifying but got to playoff by their winning a group in Nations League C (for teams 29 and lower in Europe), they won their two playoff games and are in the world cupSlowly backing into the Cup
This percentage is way too low, this website rates our wins as flukes due to the expected goals % or something. I think our "power ranking" went down today, after we beat TB on the road, because we did it while being greatly outshot.We're at 3%
Yes, scoring chances differential is the main factor that brings us down in their model. With our defense, we're not exactly nerdies' favorite.This percentage is way too low, this website rates our wins as flukes due to the expected goals % or something. I think our "power ranking" went down today, after we beat TB on the road, because we did it while being greatly outshot.
it has been better than last 8 games though for sure. We have only given up more than 2 goals with a goalie in the net once in the last 8 games. You are right though, our previous defensive records hurts us odds wiseYes, scoring chances differential is the main factor that brings us down in their model. With our defense, we're not exactly nerdies' favorite.
Yes, scoring chances differential is the main factor that brings us down in their model. With our defense, we're not exactly nerdies' favorite.
Nothing but luckSlowly backing into the Cup
One thing about regression models…I could have sworn the moneypuck ranking was 11th or 12th yesterday and is 13th today after a huge win. Among other things, their predictions probably assume Caufield is really a 30 goal scorer instead a 47 goal scorer. The Habs may not be “top contenders” as their current performance indicates, but it’s more due to the inexperience/size factor than their wins being fluky as the model suggests.
playoffs are different beast , lets see if we can win a roundI could have sworn the moneypuck ranking was 11th or 12th yesterday and is 13th today after a huge win. Among other things, their predictions probably assume Caufield is really a 30 goal scorer instead a 47 goal scorer. The Habs may not be “top contenders” as their current performance indicates, but it’s more due to the inexperience/size factor than their wins being fluky as the model suggests.
I’m interested in watching what the young players got from last years experience..playoffs are different beast , lets see if we can win a round
One thing about regression models…
Garbage in garbage out.
Yup , plus if goalies are ready under pressureI’m interested in watching what the young players got from last years experience..
the Blues is a one in a million eventThere are profound psychological factors that are hard to evaluate.
Consider Cam Ward in 2006.
Or the St. Louis Blues…