• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

I`m pretty sure we all agree that sharing intel about an investigation is not a good thing.

So do you want pages and pages of posts of people agreeing that its not a good thing?

Or can we just agree that ****ing up the relationship with the British Government and the Intel Sharing Apparatus is probably a bad thing, and move on.

I don't see anyone supporting the leaks on this investigation.
 
You know what else I don't see.

Pages and pages criticizing Trump for sharing the location of nuclear subs with Duterte

I think again, we are all agreed on this point, so no one is making big long posts about it.


The false outrage that no one is outraged about the British Investigation stuff is just a little ridiculous.
 
yeah we were all writing epic diatribes against trump's insane leaks of confidential info.

pages and pages of angry screeds.

good call.
 
yeah we were all writing epic diatribes against trump's insane leaks of confidential info.

pages and pages of angry screeds.

good call.
pages 3114 to 3119 were talking about the trump leak.

Nobody cares about Britain shutting out the USA from it's intel.

Ok, fine, nothing to see here folks.

Lord knows there's going to be another 5 pages of trump sucks whenever he blurts more sensitive intel though.
 
yeah I'm sure they were full of rants.

how many posts on those pages were from you, given your righteous non-partisan anger you say you had at the time?
 
pages 3114 to 3119 were talking about the trump leak.

Nobody cares about Britain shutting out the USA from it's intel.

Ok, fine, nothing to see here folks.

Lord knows there's going to be another 5 pages of trump sucks whenever he blurts more sensitive intel though.

You really don't understand why leaks from anonymous sources within the United States massive intelligence community to the media are receiving fewer comments than the President of the United States leaking intel to Russia in the oval office? Really?
 
You really don't understand why leaks from anonymous sources within the United States massive intelligence community to the media are receiving fewer comments than the President of the United States leaking intel to Russia in the oval office? Really?

He also seems to argue that because there isn't rants about it, it means people approve of the leaks in this case.
 
Alright I'll do my part.

Hey everyone you know that anonymous source from that unnamed organization who leaked that sensitive Manchester info to the media? I don't think he/she should have done that. He/she is a bad person, and should be fired.

Better?
 
On top of that, how do we know who did it? Who is somebody assuming it's somebody out to get Trump?

There are leaks that definitely include material damaging for Trump and it's doubtful that those are coming from a pro Trump source.....stuff like info on the Manchester attack though, serves trumps narrative more than any other.
 
Alright I'll do my part.

Hey everyone you know that anonymous source from that unnamed organization who leaked that sensitive Manchester info to the media? I don't think he/she should have done that. He/she is a bad person, and should be fired.

Better?

I agree with you.
 
There are leaks that definitely include material damaging for Trump and it's doubtful that those are coming from a pro Trump source.....stuff like info on the Manchester attack though, serves trumps narrative more than any other.

How many factions do you believe are leaking information within the security apparatus?

IMHO, the majority of leaked info to date has been damaging to trump, rightly or wrongly, that's irrelevant. That leads me to believe that at the very least there are anti Trump individuals leaking intel withing the intel community. There might be a pro trump faction leaking intel as well, but I would say that's up in the air. Regardless, at this point, it's going to take a full shutdown, purge, or at the very least giving certain groups different intel and seeing which ends up in the WaPo or NYT to figure out what the hell is going on and by who, and how deep it runs.

Any which way you cut it, it plays into the hands of US adversaries seeing as how other intelligence agencies wont share their sensitive information with the US and the US is going to need to lockdown, teardown and purge their own security services, and who do you trust to do that?

But Yawn, who cares, am I right?
 
Back
Top