• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: NFL Thread

I was listening to a podcast from an MMA journalist/analyst many years ago and he was talking about an incident in MMA when a fighter got kneed in the head (legal strike, nothing bad about it) and that it was probably the worst injury in the history of high-level MMA. You can click on the link to see some of the details if you want, it's not gore or particularly hard to stomach, but fair warning ahead of time.


He mentioned something that I had never really thought about, but agreed with instantly: MMA is a combat sport where the goal, in large part, is to destroy the opponent's body before they destroy yours so that you can be considered the winner. At the end of the contest, both competitors come out damaged, but at a level that is "acceptable". But if you think about it, those of us who watch the sport should consider ourselves extremely lucky that there aren't more incidents like these when you consider the amount of leg kicks that connect to the head, the occasional elbow to the face, etc.

Because if something like that happened regularly, the sport could not possibly be legal.

It made me think about tonight's incident. You always hear about how players feel like they've gone through car crashes every every game and they're beat up the day after; That so many players leave the game with broken bodies and fucked up brains from a full life of getting physically abused by playing the sport. If incidents like tonight's incident happened regularly in College Football and/or the NFL, how could you possibly argue that football could/should be legal to play without massive changes to the game itself?

I saw a video of Marvin Harrison Jr. getting hit during a game this weekend. The sound is terrifying and you can only wonder, how the fuck did that not kill him?

 
I don't get the outrage at what he's saying. I really don't.

He's asking a legitimate question before the game was postponed and in the same sentence, says the game "seems so irrelevant".

I get that Skip says dumb shit on TV all the time to stir the LeBron slander, but this?

The timing is the issue.
 
I don't get the outrage at what he's saying. I really don't.

He's asking a legitimate question before the game was postponed and in the same sentence, says the game "seems so irrelevant".

I get that Skip says dumb shit on TV all the time to stir the LeBron slander, but this?
I still have no idea how they will reschedule that game. I seriously doubt they would push the playoffs. It's also an important game for the standings but straight up ending it in a tie might be the easiest, if unfair, way out.
 
I still have no idea how they will reschedule that game. I seriously doubt they would push the playoffs. It's also an important game for the standings but straight up ending it in a tie might be the easiest, if unfair, way out.

they do not intend to although I think they should play it tomorrow. It means too much in the standings not to play it and I doubt they would want to play it on Wednesday next week and give a team 4 days before a playoff game. It really is a situation where any decision is bad.
 
I get the feeling that they're not going to replay it. If they don't replay it tomorrow, it would be nearly impossible to ask them to play it Thursday and then play another game on Monday/Tuesday, before having at least one of them play a playoff game the Sunday after.
 
NFl already announced they will not replay the game this week...

maybe they push the playoffs back a week...and shorten the two week break before the Super Bowl to one week..
 
There's too much money involved and TV slots assigned to push everything back by a week.

The simplest and most cost-efficient way is to forfeit the game, or use the score at the moment of the injury as the final score, or call it a tie.
 
The Cardinals fired their coach today. The same guy who had a losing record at Texas Tech with Pat Mahomes as his QB. Yeah.
 
I was listening to a podcast from an MMA journalist/analyst many years ago and he was talking about an incident in MMA when a fighter got kneed in the head (legal strike, nothing bad about it) and that it was probably the worst injury in the history of high-level MMA. You can click on the link to see some of the details if you want, it's not gore or particularly hard to stomach, but fair warning ahead of time.


He mentioned something that I had never really thought about, but agreed with instantly: MMA is a combat sport where the goal, in large part, is to destroy the opponent's body before they destroy yours so that you can be considered the winner. At the end of the contest, both competitors come out damaged, but at a level that is "acceptable". But if you think about it, those of us who watch the sport should consider ourselves extremely lucky that there aren't more incidents like these when you consider the amount of leg kicks that connect to the head, the occasional elbow to the face, etc.

Because if something like that happened regularly, the sport could not possibly be legal.

It made me think about tonight's incident. You always hear about how players feel like they've gone through car crashes every every game and they're beat up the day after; That so many players leave the game with broken bodies and fucked up brains from a full life of getting physically abused by playing the sport. If incidents like tonight's incident happened regularly in College Football and/or the NFL, how could you possibly argue that football could/should be legal to play without massive changes to the game itself?

I saw a video of Marvin Harrison Jr. getting hit during a game this weekend. The sound is terrifying and you can only wonder, how the fuck did that not kill him?


best DB hit all college season,,
 
Yeah, but I need Buffalo to win by 14 or more.

It's still possible, but it's unlikely now.
 
Back
Top