Trading a top 10 prospect for a barely .200 hitting defender is going to be a fireable offence if team and Varsho continue to struggleMoreno is looking decent at the plate so far this year. Lourdes is as well actually.
Trading a top 10 prospect for a barely .200 hitting defender is going to be a fireable offence if team and Varsho continue to struggle
Looking back, cashing in on Kirk would have been the best move, but that always was the impossible decision.It was a bad trade from the onset imo. So much of his value was tied up in his right field defence....so we play him in left field where it means nothing. I don't see him continuing forever as a 80 wrc+ bat, but I never saw much of an argument for him being any better than 110 either. That's basically a 2-2.5 WAR LF.
Meh.
Needed to trade a catcher, but should have been Jansen or Kirk.
Springer has a stronger arm, that's why they put him in right field.
I think (hope) Varsho is the CF of the future.
i think the idea was to split time in CF, there was no guarantee KK would be this good, plus he's been injured a lot the last few years and on a 1-year deal. varsho probably slots into CF next year, though they could bring KK back.But then why trade for a right fielder with a mediocre bat and tons of value tied up in his right field glove? Just keep Teoscar, slot him in LF (where his glove isn't a big deal at all) and keep it moving?
i think the idea was to split time in CF, there was no guarantee KK would be this good, plus he's been injured a lot the last few years and on a 1-year deal. varsho probably slots into CF next year, though they could bring KK back.
i'm sure they expected some improvement with the bat from Varsho as well. A .190/.207 ISO the last 2 years suggests more power is coming based on this year's .153.
i was never in love with the trade though it did make sense to move one of the three C's. Definitely need more from Varsho at the plate though.