• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: World Politics

Of course, "western journalists" aren't any more or less "aghast" at any of the protests.
 
Just out. Maybe they read the article and many others pointing out the bias.
 
Last edited:
Here's CNN reporting on the "riots" over "metro fares":


You favourite news outlet: "arson" "riots" ...


NYT: "violent unrest"


Vice: "burned bodies" and "riots"


I guess even these proven lying propagandists can't continue with this bullshit when there's ample videos circulating with military vehicles roaming the streets and protesters being shot.
 
Please keep going.






 
Oh look who called them riots in Venezuela



[/URL]
 
Defending these scum is not a good look.

So, you post links of them calling the protests violent, "escalating level of violence on the streets" ... to support the claim? I'm confused.

Do you see them referred to democracy lovers anywhere? Or the state as being a dictatorship, authoritarian or any of the myriad accusations and lies they throw around liberally at Venezula?
 


 
BBC is state owned.

Let's check the homepages of the so-called liberal corporate media ...

New York Times: nada
CNN: nyet
MSNBC: 0
Washington Post: nope
Yahoo: nein
Huffington Post: non
 
Back
Top