I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree with this one. I think you draft for skill. If you try and draft for size, it seems more often than not you wind up with a shitload of really tough ECHLers/AHLers.
Defense is never sexy, but you can't get far in this league without it. I like our chances at finally getting a cohesive, coherent defense that isn't a bunch of cast offs and overslotted AHLers. Defense by committee has gotten this franchise nowhere in years. I could really be enticed by two very decent defensive pairings and would not miss the days of Tomas Kaberle, Joe Corvo, Jay Harrison, Bruno St. Jacques, Bret Carson, Andrew Hutchison, Derek Joslin, Josef Melichar, Wade Brookbank, etc...
Defense is sexy to some people ... like me. But I know I'm a deviant freak when it comes to that.
I'm just saying it worked. Burkie built tough yet skilled depth in both Anaheim and Vancouver before a similar approach just didn't work in Toronto. Again ... I don't think approach that worked twice before was so much the problem as simply not picking the right guys.
A great dman is so awesome to have. It doesn't get much "sexier" than a Subban or Karlsson. Problem is that people want instant gratification and dmen tend to take longer to develop. It's pretty rare for them to have an impact in the NHL at 18/19 years old. Forwards these days seem to be able to have an impact early.
Defense is sexy to some people ... like me. But I know I'm a deviant freak when it comes to that.
Funny... I thought Karlsson and Subban were both quite poor compared to their usual play. Karlsson seemed more concerned with throwing hits than creating goals. He also got burned really bad several times defensively.