No, you see, we must punish someone because we feel bad, even if it makes the team worse.
Exactly. The answer, the only answer, is to work around the general fringes of the roster, and try again. As tempting as it is to make a big change to get a different result finally, the big change has a huge chance of backfiring, while sticking with the core could simply result in our finally winning the coin flip next time. The big change, which wouldn’t even really be one imo, and is a necessity imo, is trading Muzz. You can open a lot of money, get a lot in return, and create room for young, mobile, and surely great players in Lilly and Sandin. That’s the biggest move this season, and it only involves deleting an older oft-injured guy for two young studs.
And all this goalie talk of the last few pages is again part of the same scapegoating mistake. Jack went blow for blow with the best goalie in the league until the final buzzer of game 7. I recall him saving our bacon in some of the wins and being strong while we came back from deficits like in the game 6 we should’ve won. He had as many “great” saves as Vasy in the series, and Vasy didn’t scare me or make me think we badly need an upgrade. He made me, and all of you think over and over, “shoot the puck!”, especially on the PP. I think Price last year was much better than Vasy this year, and under more difficult circumstances coming back from 3-1. We don’t need some other supposed wizard to work magic in the net that we will never see. Upgrade on the backup to have a proper second option. That’s it.
Small changes to get the small improvement to take us over the top. And if there’s any big change (again, I don’t think a Muzz trade qualifies, and would be an immensely smart cap and hockey move), that big change would be to replace Keefe. And I don’t even think I’d do that yet.