• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Play-in Round: Toronto Maple Leafs (8) vs Columbus Blue Jackets (9)

I mean ya ya talking about it is a jinx and all but if we do win tommorrow it would be nice to get PHI instead of TB, BOS, WSH...not that PHI isn't good, and yes they are confident and hot right now, but it would be the first time we play a non-elite defensive team in the playoffs (tho in yr1 the caps were perhaps a tick below elite defensively).

16-17: WSH #8 xga/60
17-18: BOS #2 xga/60
18-19: BOS #2 xga/60
19-20: CBJ #2 xga/60, PHI #12 xga/60
 
I want everyone to remember that the leafs' collapses were always blamed on "fundamentally flawed defense".

Whereas Columbus still remains one of the elite defensive teams in hockey.
 
=sum (b32*c31)/D34

So sexy


nutbutton.png
 
I think Spezza became a leaf last night. He didn't have to push so hard but he did.
 
I'm aroused by anyone in canoe.
I want everyone to remember that the leafs' collapses were always blamed on "fundamentally flawed defense".

Whereas Columbus still remains one of the elite defensive teams in hockey.
According to Mirtle (who I am starting to tune out), they got "lucky."
 
I want everyone to remember that the leafs' collapses were always blamed on "fundamentally flawed defense".

Whereas Columbus still remains one of the elite defensive teams in hockey.

Monday it will be very interesting to sort through all the narratives around this team and series, and which ones did or didn't apply.
 
Funny Mirtle factoid ... tweeted that they were "done" after the 3rd goal ... and then felt the need to delete it, even though everyone had the exact same thought.
 
You mean his hard hitting analysis that the leafs got lucky to score three empty netters in under 4 minutes? Man that's content worth paying for

all analysis is redundant. just need a reliable data stream that provides accurate xGF and PLgFx and most of us can figure out what happened.
 
Back
Top