I don't have a problem with the strategy. It's the target that's the problem. Hell, even if Byram was signed to a beauty contract already. Like 3-5-6 years x $6 or even 7m or something... but now they have to throw a bunch of money at a guy that might just be a good 2nd pairing guy.I think this was more about wanting Byram, than trying to move the pick. They obviously want to stop rebuilding and start winning, and Byram is 25 years old. They'll give him all the minutes and probably PP1. He'll certainly be better the next 2-3 years than anybody they would have drafted.
That still doesn't justify the price. Upside is great but one year of Byram before having to pay him big bucks just isn't worth this much at current market value.