BeLeafer
Well-known member
He's, like, that antichrist, man.Never heard of him
He's, like, that antichrist, man.Never heard of him
Series played out exactly how I expected times 10. Hilariously bad luck. But 5 game samples often result in these goofy stats. A couple years ago if I remember correctly Chicago had under a 1% s% and they got swept. It's a miracle that the leafs even won a game really.Presto cursed them.
At the end of the day they got hurt by luck against a team that based on your expectations of the team (not my own expectations personally), luck should not have been a major factor against . But luck only mattered this much because there is not much separating these two teams. That's just hockey folks.
Yeah they have guys that make a lot of money. But they haven't played with any sort of quality or consistency for years so I'm not going to expect them to suddenly become the 80's Oilers because it's playoffs. There's a large enough sample size to support my opinion that they're a slightly above average team, a clear leg down from the top tier squads in the Show.Im terms of results all year, definitely. In terms of roster potential, I don't think it's close.
Keefe said they played a good defensive series but:
CA/60: 57.95
GA/60: 2.15
xGA/60: 1.77
Columbus Regular Season:
CF/60: 53.45
GF/60: 2.16
xGF/60: 2.18
They can't confuse Columbus sucking at offense with playing good defense.
How you holding up brother?Wait - that is a massive difference in xg.
So after seeing what Joonas whathisname is doing vs Tampa, can we give the Leafs any credit for running into a hot goalie?
So after seeing what Joonas whathisname is doing vs Tampa, can we give the Leafs any credit for running into a hot goalie?