zeke
Well-known member
so it's never like the NHL where you can strike out on all of your picks and get nothing out of a draft.
Sure you can.
so it's never like the NHL where you can strike out on all of your picks and get nothing out of a draft.
No it's not.
As a neutral observer that doesn't know whether you're right or not, it does seem like a bit of this going on:
View attachment 28305
Is there where we're going to get into a conversation about pyth, statcast expected runs, etc, etc that all say more or less the same thing about the Jays or are you just going to try to Zeke me with their rankings in cherry picked team statistics that aren't actually well establish predictive indicators of W/L record?
Jays rankings:
MLB W%: 3rd
Raw Run Diff: 10th
Pyth: 10th
Baseruns: 10th
ESPN ExWP: 11th
Somewhat unrelated to that point, but important:
Last 10 WS Champions (Reg Season plain old boring run/diff ranking)
2024: Dodgers (1st)
2023: Rangers (4th)
2022: Houston (3rd)
2021: Atlanta (7th)
2020: Dodgers (1st)
2019: Washington (6th)
2018: Boston (2nd)
2017: Houston (3rd)
2016: Cubs (1st)
2015: Royals (6th)
High: 1st, Low: 7th, Average: 3rd
Ok, but you can’t deny that they could win a playoff game this year.
Is there where we're going to get into a conversation about pyth, statcast expected runs, etc, etc that all say more or less the same thing about the Jays or are you just going to try to Zeke me with their rankings in cherry picked team statistics that aren't actually well establish predictive indicators of W/L record?
Jays rankings:
MLB W%: 3rd
Raw Run Diff: 10th
Pyth: 10th
Baseruns: 10th
ESPN ExWP: 11th
Somewhat unrelated to that point, but important:
Last 10 WS Champions (Reg Season plain old boring run/diff ranking)
2024: Dodgers (1st)
2023: Rangers (4th)
2022: Houston (3rd)
2021: Atlanta (7th)
2020: Dodgers (1st)
2019: Washington (6th)
2018: Boston (2nd)
2017: Houston (3rd)
2016: Cubs (1st)
2015: Royals (6th)
High: 1st, Low: 7th, Average: 3rd
I hope they win many and shut me up.
I'm just not giving many fucks about a ~91 win division title. Division titles are cute, but they're a throwback to when you had to win your division to make the playoffs...I don't really care that the Leafs won the division last year either, it's not the measure of success I'm looking for.
"Won a game in the playoffs" shouldn't be the top of the mountain for a 10 yr front office regime.
Do you have any evidence that this has better predictive value than run diff based stats though? My understanding of WAR based predictive tools is that they're actually better early in the season than they are late in the season (because projecting small sample is hard) but regardless of how they're used, on the team level, just not as good as run diff:No, this is where i tell you to look at something that actually considers the players likely on the roster going forward and not just what the team has done on the season so far.
So if we look at fangraphs' rest of season depth chart projections, we see these total war projections the rest of the way:
1. LAD 14.5 (44gms)
2. PHI 14.0 (45gms)
3. NYY 13.0 (44gms)
4. SDP 12.9 (44gms)
5. NYM 12.7 (44gms)
6. TOR 12.6 (43gms)
6. SEA 12.6 (43gms)
8. CHC 12.6 (45gms)
9. HOU 11.9 (44gms)
10. TEX 11.1 (43gms)
So you get LAD as a clearcut #1, PHI as a clearcut #2, and then 6 teams clumped up within 0.4, including TOR who is projected to get that WAR in one fewer game than the others aside from SEA (technically tor and sea are tied for 5th in projected war per game, a few thousandths of a point behind SDP in 4th). After that it's a substantial drop to HOU at #9, and then another big drop to TEX at #10.
and despite the excitement generated by a 29-11 stretch,
Why do you keep forgetting that they are 1st in the AL tho.
Zeke's transformation from fighting every positive word out of Axl for years about Shatkins to now defending the crown and legacy of the Shatkings against Mindz is actually one of the best things about this sudden leap to the next level by our beloved Jays.
All I heard here was, Shatkings Forever.It's not hard to criticize bad play and praise good play. Not all of us care about our personal fetishes for or against individual names.
Shapkins finally are fielding a team that is doong what the payroll suggests it should do. That's no great accomplishment.
And the best move of the offseason was rogers stepping up and paying vladdy way more than shatkins were willing to. That move changed everything. Without that we would have been blowing it all up at the deadline.
This argument you've invented where you create an artificial arbitrary endpoint sample in order to dismiss over a third of the season so far and a quarter of the total season is a weird one for sure.