I won't be. But winning is good and this team has found a way to win alot of games with some clutch performances from young up-and-coming players.Fair enough.
This is true. Just don't be shocked if the directional change isn't quite where this run has made it appear to be.
They certainly regressed offensively - but it did expose some scary realities in what kind of effort and drive these guys have. Remember, this is the same core that has some pretty significant meltdowns.Except you have to account for massive regressions by JVR, Kessel and Kadri
.937% - which is certainly unsustainable, but we don't claim to be a 135 point team.while they had upswing ticks for their young players while having unsustainable .940ish goaltending from an AHLer.
Ceci is "middling"? If that is actually your opinion of him as a player then I'm not sure why I would bother responding further. A 3rd pairing of Cowen/Weircoch/Gryba/Boroweicki is fine. I've long maintained that Ottawa needs one top-4 defenseman. Hopefully they can go out and buy one.Do they have an all-world D in Karlsson? Absolutely.He's surrounded by middling partners like Ceci, Wiercioch and bottom-pairing trogs like Borowiecki, Gryba and Cowen. Methot is a #3 on a contending team but complements Karlsson well.
Or you can not be a complete homer and recognize progression of players in their early 20's.Their forwards are a mixed bag and I'd caution against reading too much from their young forward production though or their run. It's easy to feed off that energy for 30 or so games but when the grind sets in...
So Montreal is in the best position, why? They also have ridden unsustainable goaltending the entire season. I don't expect Price to drop to .900% - but he won't be a .930%+ guy year in and year out. Defensively they are below average, and offensively they are average. You are completely talking out of both sides of your mouth here.At the moment Montreal is the best of our teams. Toronto is obviously stripping it down so will be much worse than the other two and Ottawa will be middling to upper middling (7-11, maybe a little higher), but again if their goaltending drops to .920 or .915 from .930+ that's some lost points in the standings.
Because you are a raging homer.And their GM is at the end of his lifespan so he'll need to be replaced. Not really seeing the "better organizational situation".
I won't be. But winning is good and this team has found a way to win alot of games with some clutch performances from young up-and-coming players.
I don't think this is a 130 point team. But I think this current core has the potential to be a 6th-9th place team and a few pieces away from competing for home ice in the next 2 years.
Because you are a raging homer.
At this point i really do not know what management can do to make this team better. Tearing down and stripping the team to me is not a way a team should be built. Where we really need to see an organizational shift is at the draft table. I've said it before but to get better we need to draft better than Biggs, Devane, Ross etc.
YOU are the only one building a strawman and pretending anyone claimed the Sens are as good as their current run.Fair enough.
This is true. Just don't be shocked if the directional change isn't quite where this run has made it appear to be.
Meh, we've been where the Sens are as an organization. One real all world talent with a bunch of secondary young guys and a few decent veterans, but no way to realistically add the additional elite players necessary to turn them into a legitimate contender level club.
It didn't turn out well for us, and I don't see it turning out well for them. You can argue that where they are is a "better place" to be as an organization, but it's not exactly the place that a contender is built from, so meh.
We have to start letting our young players play.
Sorry, when were you here?Meh, we've been where the Sens are as an organization. One real all world talent with a bunch of secondary young guys and a few decent veterans, but no way to realistically add the additional elite players necessary to turn them into a legitimate contender level club.
It didn't turn out well for us, and I don't see it turning out well for them. You can argue that where they are is a "better place" to be as an organization, but it's not exactly the place that a contender is built from, so meh.
YOU are the only one building a strawman and pretending anyone claimed the Sens are as good as their current run.
Sorry, when were you here?
Feel free to post that roster.