• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: The News Thread

That sounds horrible....I think the longest I ever went without a day off was 22 days, 8 hour shifts at that....and it still felt like a nightmare. Can't imagine doing that ^^

I think the longest shift I ever worked was 13hrs/day for 6 weeks straight and by the end of it I almost cracked. The days start to blend after week 3 and you basically work and sleep. I would leave for work at 7pm, get back to camp at 9 am and sleep until 6pm, eat and then back on the bus.

It helps pad the bank account but its tough on the body

WIMPS!

Try 12 years of 24/6 shifts. With maybe about 2 weeks a year off. Run the business aspect by day, set-up/programming/design/development in the midnight shift. I actually liked what I did and never found it too boring otherwise I don't think that I would of lasted that long.

My father worked two jobs with no time off for 7 years straight. Casting factory during the week and restaurant chef on the weekends. It was far, far tougher then what I did physically.

Wife worked 6am to 5-6pm at the plant for about 15 years too.

When I die, I'm going straight to hell to a Nazi work camp.
 
what is the difference? harder criminals in federal prison? or something else as well?

An acquaintance of mine from my much earlier days spent some time in both provincial and federal prisons. The difference according to him was if you do something wrong in a provincial jail, you get punched. If you do something wrong in a pen, you get stabbed.

I've heard people say that they prefer pen time because there are less jerkoffs trying to prove how tough they are than in a provincial or regional jail.

Just passing it along.
 
I see it the other way, the system works because it does not cowtow to the hang em high mentality the mob has.
What about when serial rapists and molesters get less then 2 years in jail?

Maybe the mob is right and the power tripping, know-it-all judge, got it wrong.
 

... based on some very creative manipulation of numbers.
How We Ranked the Cities – The Calculations

A total of 105 points was up for grabs. Each category (below) was allotted a number of points depending on the importance of the category. For example, employment statistics are worth 10 points while sales taxes are worth 1 point. Some categories are further broken into subcategories. For example, the crime category is determined by statistics in the subcategories of violent crime, crime severity and total crime.

The top city in each category received the maximum number of points, and the rest of the cities received descending incremental points based on their ranking.

Categories and Points

WALK/BIKE TO WORK
: 7 points – This represents the percentage of people who walked or took their bike to work. Source: 2006 Statistics Canada reports

WEATHER
: 18 points – (6 for each : amount of precipitation, number of wet days, days below 0°C). Ideal volume of precipitation is considered to be 700 mm per year. Source: Environment Canada

AIR QUALITY
: 2 points – One point for parts per million of ozone and one point for levels of suspended fine particulate matter, both of which are major components of smog. Source: Monitoring stations in or nearest to each city as reported by the National Air Pollution Surveillance Network.

POPULATION GROWTH
: 10 points – Results are based on the average Canadian population growth rate from 2006-2011 of 5.9% plus 2%. Higher growth rates create problems as cities struggle to provide services to growing populations. Lower growth rates means less opportunities. Cities with negative growth received 0 points. Source: 2011 Statistics Canada figures

UNEMPLOYMENT
: 10 points – 2011 data from Statistics Canada when provided and 2012 estimates derived from Canadian Demographics.

HOUSING
: 15 points – (7.5 for average house prices and 7.5 for time to buy a house) House price averages from reports and listings by MLS, Canadian Real Estate Association, and the Real Estate Boards of Toronto, Fraser Valley, Vancouver, Edmonton and Quebec. Time to buy was derived from average price divided by average 2012 estimated household income sourced from Canadian Demographics.

HOUSEHOLD INCOME
: 4 points – Based on 2012 estimates. Source: Canadian Demographics.

DISCRETIONARY INCOME
: 4 points – Discretionary household income as a percentage of total household income derived from 2012 estimates. Using a percentage figure adjusts for higher cost of living and tax factors. Source: Canadian Demographics.

NEW CARS
: 4 points – 2009-2011 model year vehicles as a percent of total vehicles as per Canadian Demographics.

INCOME TAXES
: 2 points – Cities ranked (lower is better) according to the rate of combined federal and provincial (or territorial) income tax paid on a single person income of $50,000. Source: www.taxtips.ca.

SALES TAXES
: 1 point – Cities ranked (lower is better) according to the rate of provincial or territorial sales tax.

CRIME
: 5 points – Violent crime rates (2 points), total crime rates per 100,000 people (2 points) and crime severity rates (1 point) for 2010. (Lower is better in all three cases.) Source: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.

DOCTORS
: 6 points – Number of general practice and specialist physicians per community and converted to doctors per 1,000 people. Source: Canadian Medical Association

HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
: 4 points – Percentage of people in each city who are employed in health occupations. Source: 2006 Census

TRANSIT
: 5 points – Based on the percentage of the workforce utilizing public transit. Source: 2006 Census

AMENITIES
: 3 points – One point each for a hospital, university and college. Cities in a CMA area received credit if a particular institution was located anywhere in the CMA.

CULTURE
: Bonus points – A city could receive up to 5 points based on the percentage of people employed in arts, culture, recreation and sports. Source: 2006 Census
Best Places to Live 2012 displays cities’ rankings in each category and total rankings out of 190 cities, not points.

All data and calculations are on this downloadable spreadsheet.

Sub-list: Best Places for Jobs

This calculation was adjusted to account for services and requirements for those looking for work. The list eliminates weather, air quality, walk/ bike to work, new cars, culture and crime categories.
The point system;
Employment25
Housing15
Income15
Discret. Income15
Taxes10
Transit7
Doctors6
Population5
Health Pros4
Ammenities3
Total105

Sub-list: Best Places to Raise Kids

This calculation included the following additional categories;

  • child care spaces
  • population 14 and under
  • percentage of students
Note, some of the statistics are available only province to province instead of city by city. Sources: Canadian Demographics 2012 edition childcare space statistics 2008 report published by the Childcare Resource and Research Unit www.childcarecanada.org, Statistics Canada Summary Public School Indicators and 2010 Provincial population projections
The point system;
POPULATION 14 AND UNDER7
DAYCARE SPACES5
STUDENT AS A % POPULATION3
AVERAGE HOUSE PRICE9
TIME TO BUY A HOUSE9
HOUSEHOLD INCOME6
DISCRETIONARY INCOME4
INCOME TAXES2
SALES TAXES1
POPULATION GROWTH5
CRIME5
DOCTORS6
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS4
UNEMPLOYMENT10
WEATHER12
AIR QUALITY2
TRANSIT7
AMENITIES3
CULTURE (Bonus)5
TOTAL105

Sub-list: Best Places to Retire

The calculations were adjusted to emphasize services and conditions for retirees.
The point system;
WALK/BIKE TO WORK7
CLIMATE30
POP. GROWTH10
HOUSING15
INCOME TAXES3
SALES TAXES2
CRIME5
DOCTORS/100012
HEALTH PROS8
TRANSIT5
AMENITIES3
CULTURE (Bonus)5
TOTAL105
 
link
Three companies, including Canadian Tire, have pleaded guilty to fixing gasoline prices in southeastern Ontario, resulting in combined fines of $2 million, the national Competition Bureau says.

Canadian Tire Corp., Pioneer Energy LP and Mr. Gas pleaded guilty to charges under the Competition Act that they consulted with each other between May and November 2007 to set gasoline prices in the cities of Kingston and Brockville, the bureau said in a statement.

The bureau said the charges were the result of an extensive investigation that followed evidence that local representatives of these companies were making phone calls to each other to set gas prices during the time in question.

"Consumers in Kingston and Brockville were denied a competitive price for gasoline as a result of this criminal price-fixing cartel," Melanie Aitken, the commissioner of competition, said in a statement. "The bureau will not hesitate to take action when it uncovers evidence of illegal price-fixing."

The bureau said it is continuing to investigate potential cases of gasoline price-fixing in southeastern Ontario.

As for the specific fines, the bureau said Canadian Tire was fined $900,000, Pioneer $985,000 and Mr. Gas $150,000.

In another recent case, 38 people and 14 companies were charged in connection to fixing gas prices in the Quebec cities of Victoriaville, Thetford Mines, Magog and Sherbrooke.
 
link
There is a reason the Conservative Party launched an attack ad against Bob Rae on the same week as the NDP leadership convention.

The Conservatives are convinced Mr. Rae will lead the Liberal Party into the next election–an increasingly safe assumption. And they fear him more than they fear whomever the New Democrats choose on Saturday. So while the Tories wait to learn who will lead the official opposition, they’re getting their licks in against what they see as the greater threat.

Though nominally only interim leader, Mr. Rae’s hold on the job appears unassailable. Potential rivals – Quebec MP Justin Trudeau, former Quebec cabinet minister Martin Cauchon, New Brunswick MP Dominic LeBlanc – have either decided they’re not interested, or have tested the waters and found them frigid. Ottawa MP David McGuinty, brother to Ontario’s premier, and MP and former astronaut Marc Garneau may also be interested, but at this point Mr. Rae is seen as by far the most credible permanent leader for the third party.

Mr. Rae has solid support in caucus, and can point to rising poll numbers as proof of his effectiveness on the job. He may also be the best candidate to execute a strategy penned by John Duffy, a former adviser to Paul Martin, whose recent article in Policy Options magazine has been widely and carefully read by Liberals everywhere.


Mr. Duffy believes Canada is fracturing between the commodity producing West and the industrial East, which is suffering from the high dollar those commodities fetch.


If you ask me, the best way to ensure a Cons win is to have Rae lead the Libs.
 
As someone who's voted Liberal multiple times in the past, personally I won't even consider voting for them as long as Rae is their leader, interim or otherwise.
 
I was born and raised in Ottawa, and live here when I am off work, and I really like it here.

BUT, the weather sucks, the public transit system is a pathetic joke, and the nightlife is lame. I wouldn't want to need to find a job here either.

As far as cities go, it's like the 3 stooges did the planning. No subway / rail transit other than this useless O-Train that goes nowhere, and try getting to/from Quebec at rush hour. Or try to get from the city to the airport without getting ass raped.

I can think of better places to live. But I will say if suburbs, strip malls and boredom are your thing, you can't go wrong here.
 
What about when serial rapists and molesters get less then 2 years in jail?

Maybe the mob is right and the power tripping, know-it-all judge, got it wrong.

you don't know what the judge heard, you don't know what was submitted by Crown/defence lawyers re the sentence (crown only asked for six years so they hardly thought it was so serious as to require a really long sentence), he pled guilty early, saved Crown a trial, saved the need for the victims to testify and be forced to bring up their past, he already served time in jail for an offence that occurred at the same time so arguably if you ad his 3.5 to the 2 he received, he basically got what the crown asked for re sentence.

What more do you want? What would satisfy your thirst for vengeance?

As for the judge being a power tripping know it all, well she does know more about the law than you, therefore you should accept her verdict.
 
He should serve in general population.

That would be fair.

As for the judge being a power tripping know it all, well she does know more about the law than you, therefore you should accept her verdict.

Heh.

nazi-special-courts.jpg
 
If Clifford Olson or Paul Bernardo aren't getting offed by fellow inmates, I suspect Graham James will be just fine.

Maybe he will even coach the prison hockey team.
 
Back
Top